OSHA Inspection: MARINE DEPOT PRODUCTION PLANT BARSTOW

Issued

Jun 3, 2015

Abate by

Jun 29, 2015

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.22(a)(2): Floor(s) of workroom(s) were not maintained in a clean and, so far as possible, a dry condition:  CWC 226, Small Arms: Employees were exposed to slipping and falling where blast media pellets were not cleaned from the floor in the area next to the blasting machine.

Issued

Jun 3, 2015

Abate by

Jun 29, 2015

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.37(a)(3): Exit route(s) were not kept free and unobstructed:  CWC 232, Optics Shop bldg. 595, room 28: Employees were exposed to delayed access to exit routes where rolling carts and a chair were in the exit access pathway.

Issued

Jun 3, 2015

Abate by

Jun 29, 2015

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.37(b)(2): Each exit was not clearly visible and marked by a sign reading "Exit":  (a) CWC 226, Expeditor Office: Employees exposed to delayed emergency evacuation where exit signs were not posted on either emergency exit door.  (b) CWC 232, Optics Shop bldg. 595 tritium elbow room: Employees exposed to delayed emergency evacuation where exit signs were not posted on the emergency exit door.

Issued

Jun 3, 2015

Abate by

Jun 29, 2015

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.37(b)(5): Each doorway or passage along an exit access that could be mistaken for an exit must be marked "Not an Exit" or similar designation, or be identified by a sign indicating its actual use (e.g., closet).  CWC 232, Optics Shop bldg. 595 tritium elbow room: Employees were exposed to delayed evacuation where a door leading to an office was not marked to prevent it being confused with the exit access door.

Issued

Jun 3, 2015

Abate by

Jun 29, 2015

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(h)(4)(ii): Repairs were not made in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations and specifications for the type and extent of repairs to be performed:(a)  On or about 15 January 2015 the employer failed to ensure that supplied air lines were repaired accordingly were in the sand blast booth a line was wrapped with duct tape.

Issued

Jun 3, 2015

Abate by

Jun 29, 2015

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.157(e)(3): Portable fire extinguishers were not subjected to an annual maintenance check:  a) CWC 226, Small Arms: Employees exposed to fire related injuries where the employer did not complete an annual inspection of the fire extinguisher.  (b) CWC 213, Hydraulics Shop: Employees exposed to fire related injuries where the employer did not complete an annual inspection of the fire extinguisher.  (c) CWC 224, LAVS: Employees exposed to fire related injuries where the employer did not complete an annual inspection of the fire extinguisher.  (d) CWC 273, MTVR: Employees exposed to fire related injuries where the employer did not complete an annual inspection of the fire extinguisher.

Issued

Jun 3, 2015

Abate by

Jun 29, 2015

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.178(a)(4): Modifications and additions which affect capacity and safe operation of powered industrial truck were performed by the employer without prior written approval from the manufacturer:   Outside Room 607 Issue Point: A Yale lift truck was fitted with a covering over the falling object protection structure blocking the view of the operator above the vehicle.

Issued

Jun 3, 2015

Abate by

Jun 29, 2015

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.178(q)(7): Industrial trucks were not examined at least daily before being placed in service.  Employer failed to ensure that Powered industrial trucks were in a safe operating condition and taken out of service as damaged cables were identified exposing employee to electrical hazard.

Issued

Jun 3, 2015

Abate by

Jun 29, 2015

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.179(j)(2): Overhead cranes were not inspected for defects on a daily basis for items including but not limited to; all functional operating mechanisms for maladjustment, deterioration or leakage of air or hydraulic systems and hooks:  Employer failed to ensure that inspection were conducted daily to ensure equipment was not damaged maladjusted or deteriorating were at the ROTO Blast and the wash rack the hook had a damaged clip exposing employees to struck by hazard from inability to properly secure a load.

Issued

Jun 3, 2015

Abate by

Jun 29, 2015

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:  (a) CWC 213, Hydraulics shop: Employees were exposed to the unguarded horizontal rotating parts of the STR Assembly Machine when fabricating hydraulic hose sections where a method of guarding was not provided to protect the employees.  (b) CWC 121, Maintenance: Employees were exposed to unguarded rotating parts of the milling machine, debris created by the milling of metal parts, and lubricating liquid required for machine use where the employer did not provide a method to protect the employees using and around the machine.  (c) In the machine shop employees were exposed to the unguarded Rockwell drill press DP - 031

Issued

Jun 3, 2015

Abate by

Jun 29, 2015

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): The  point of operation of machines whose operation exposed an employee to injury, was not guarded:  The employer failed to ensure that employees were protected at the point of operation when utilizing lathes in the machine shop, and a press brake in sheet metal shop  (a) Sheldon Machine Company Automatic cross feed  SN TXF - 18532 - T (b) Le BLOND 16" Heavy Duty  SN 2NE772U4083 (c) Monarch Lathe SN 378232 (d) LeBLOND MKINO SN 8HS-134 U5606 (e) CINCINNATI Press Brake - sheet metal

Issued

Jun 3, 2015

Abate by

Jun 29, 2015

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.215(a)(2): Abrasive wheel(s) used on grinding machinery were not provided with safety guard(s) which covered the spindle end, nut, flange projections:  CWC 121, Maintenance: Employees using the grinder machine were exposed to the unguarded spindle end of a bench grinder where the guard did not prevent inadvertent contact with the spindle end.

Issued

Jun 3, 2015

Abate by

Jun 29, 2015

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4): Work rest(s) on grinding machinery were not adjusted closely to the wheel with a maximum opening of one eighth inch:  (a) CWC 226, Artillery Repair: Employees using grinding machinery were exposed to injury where the work rest was three-sixteenths of an inch from the grinding surface.   (b) CWC 223, AAV Finals: Employees using grinding machinery were exposed to injury where the work rest was three-sixteenths of an inch from the grinding surface.  (c) CWC 273, MTVR: Employees using grinding machinery were exposed to injury where the left and right work rests were three-sixteenths of an inch from the grinding surface.  (d) CWC 273 bldg. SS617: Employees using grinding machinery were exposed to injury where the work rest was one-quarter of an inch from the grinding surface.

Issued

Jun 3, 2015

Abate by

Jun 29, 2015

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): Exposure adjustment: Safety guards of the types described in Subparagraphs (3) and (4) of this paragraph, where the operator stands in front of the opening, shall be constructed so that the peripheral protecting member can be adjusted to the constantly decreasing diameter of the wheel. The maximum angular exposure above the horizontal plane of the wheel spindle as specified in paragraphs (b)(3) and (4) of this section shall never be exceeded, and the distance between the wheel periphery and the adjustable tongue or the end of the peripheral member at the top shall never exceed one-fourth inch. (See Figures O-18, O-19, O-20, O-21, O-22, and O-23.)  (a) CWC 226, Artillery Repair: Employees using grinding machinery were exposed to injury where the tongue guard was adjusted to five-sixteenths of an inch from the surface of the grinding wheel.   (b) CWC 226, Artillery Repair: Employees using grinding machinery were exposed to injury where the tongue guard was adjusted to five-sixteenths of an inch from the surface of the grinding wheel.  (c) CWC 271, HMMWV: Employees using grinding machinery were exposed to injury where the tongue guard was adjusted to one and one-half inches from the surface of the grinding wheel.  (d) CWC 223, AAV Finals: Employees using grinding machinery were exposed to injury where the tongue guard was removed from the machine.  (e) CWC 227, M917 Dump Trucks: Employees using grinding machinery were exposed to injury where the tongue guard was adjusted to seven-sixteenths of an inch from the surface of the grinding wheel.  (f) CWC 273, MTVR: Employees using grinding machinery were exposed to injury where the tongue guard was adjusted to three-sixteenths of an inch from the surface of the grinding wheel.  (g) CWC 273 bldg. SS617: Employees using grinding machinery were exposed to injury where the tongue guard was adjusted to almost one-half of an inch from the surface of the grinding wheel.

Issued

Jun 3, 2015

Abate by

Jun 29, 2015

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.215(d)(3): Surface condition. All contact surfaces of wheels, blotters and flanges shall be flat and free of foreign matter.  CWC 273 bldg. SS617: Employees using grinding machinery were exposed to injury where the surface of the grinding wheel contained accumulated aluminum on the side of the grinding wheel.

Issued

Jun 3, 2015

Abate by

Jun 29, 2015

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.243(c)(3): Abrasive wheels used on vertical portable grinder(s) (right angle head grinders) were not provided with safety guard(s) having a maximum exposure angle of 180 degrees and located between the operator and wheel:  On or about 15 January 2015 the employer failed to ensure that grinders in the weld shop were provided with safety guards exposing employees to struck by hazards from debris at high rate of speed.

Issued

Jun 3, 2015

Abate by

Jun 29, 2015

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.253(b)(5)(ii)(G): Cylinder valves were not closed when the work was finished:  The employer failed to ensure that once work was complete that cylinder valves were closed  (a) In the work area near beam D-39 (b) in weld shop

Issued

Jun 3, 2015

Abate by

Jun 29, 2015

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.253(e)(6)(ii): When regulators or parts of regulators, including gages, needed repair, the work was not performed by skilled mechanics who had been properly instructed:  On or about 15 April 2015 the employer failed to ensure that all gages that needed repair were fixed or replaced by a skilled mechanic, when in two different areas of the weld shop it was identified that cylinders still had pressure in the lines and the gauges were missing cover

Issued

Jun 3, 2015

Abate by

Jun 29, 2015

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.303(g)(1)(ii): The required working space about electric equipment rated 600 volts, nominal, or less to ground, was used for storage:  (a) CWC 226, Small Arms: Employees were exposed to delayed access to two single throw knife switch electrical boxes where a pallet of shrink wrapped rolls of floor material was stored directly in before the electrical boxes.  (b) CWC 226, Small Arms: Employees were exposed to delayed access to a single throw knife switch electrical box where a pallet with a tray of loose wheel parts was stored directly before the electrical box.  (c) CWC 333, Issue Point One: Employees were exposed to delayed access to a single throw knife switch electrical box where several cardboard boxes were stored directly before a circuit breaker panel box.  (d) CWC 273, MTVR: Employees were exposed to delayed access to a single throw knife switch electrical box where a work bench and file cabinet were stored directly before a circuit breaker panel box.  (e) In the LAV's area near beam D 28 employees were exposed to delayed access do to electrical panel being blocked by a large stand up fan.

Issued

Jun 3, 2015

Abate by

Jun 29, 2015

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.304(f)(1)(viii): The employer shall ensure that all circuit breakers used as switches are labeled "SWD".  On or about 15 January 2015 and time there prior to the employer failed to ensure that breakers used as switches in Building 571 CWC 215 were labeled SWD.

Issued

Jun 3, 2015

Abate by

Jun 29, 2015

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.305(b)(2)(i): Each box in completed installations did not have a cover, faceplate, or fixture canopy:  CWC 113, Material Expeditors bldg. 615: A 120VAC receptacle outlet box was left uncovered exposing the live conductors to inadvertent employee contact.

Issued

Jun 3, 2015

Abate by

Jun 29, 2015

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

2 9 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iv)(A): Flexible cords and cables were used as a substitute for the fixed wiring of a structure:  (a) CWC 272, LVSR Components: Employees exposed to electrical shock and burn hazards where an extension cord was used to provide 120VAC service to a refrigerator for over 90 days.  (b) CWC 123, Maintenance bldg. S634A: Employees exposed to electrical shock and burn hazards where an extension cord was used to provide 120VAC service to a refrigerator for over 90 days.  (c) CWC 231, Electrical shop test table had extension cord modified and used as permanent wiring.

Issued

Jun 3, 2015

Abate by

Jun 29, 2015

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iv)(D): Flexible cords and cables were attached to building surfaces:   (a) CWC 113, Planners Office: Employees exposed to electrical hazards where power strips were fastened to the wall of the room with metal screws.   (b) CWC 113, Material Expeditors bldg. 615: Employees exposed to electrical hazards where an extension cord was draped over structural supports on the walls of the building.   (c) CWC 232, Optics Shop bldg. 595: Employees exposed to electrical hazards where a power strip was fastened to the wall of the work bench with metal screws.  (d) CWC 123, Maintenance bldg. S634A: Employees were exposed to electrical hazards where extension cords were affixed to the building surface.

Issued

Jun 3, 2015

Abate by

Jun 17, 2015

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.305(g)(2)(iii): Flexible cords and cables were not connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief was provided that would prevent pull from being directly transmitted to the joints or terminal screws:  On or about 13 April 2015 and times there prior to the employer failed to ensure that at work areas in the cable shop CWC 231 that cables were not connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief was provided that would prevent pull from being directly transmitted to the joints or terminals screws which by exposing employees to shock or electrocution hazard.

Issued

Jun 3, 2015

Abate by

Jun 29, 2015

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.305(j)(1)(i): Fixtures, lamp holders, lamps, rosettes, and receptacles located had live parts normally exposed to employee contact:  CWC 121, Maintenance: Employees were exposed to inadvertent contact with live 120VAC conductors when operating the machine where the bulb had been removed from the light fixtures of the machine.

Issued

Jun 3, 2015

Abate by

Jun 29, 2015

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.334(a)(2)(ii): If there is a defect or evidence of damage that might expose an employee to injury, the defective or damaged item shall be removed from service, and no employee may use it until repairs and tests necessary to render the equipment safe have been made.  (a) CWC 226, Artillery Repair: Employees were exposed to electrical shock where the employer did not replace a damaged pendant cord.   (b) CWC 271, HMMWV: Employees were exposed to electrical shock where the employer did not replace a damaged extension cord.  (c) CWC 113, Material Expeditors bldg. 615: Employees were exposed to electrical shock where the employer did not replace a damaged extension cord.  (d) CWC 227, M917 Dump Trucks: Employees were exposed to electrical shock where the employer did not replace a damaged extension cord.  (e) CWC 123, Maintenance bldg. S634A: Employees were exposed to electrical shock where the employer did not replace a damaged extension cord.  (f) In the cable shop employees were exposed to electrical shock from the use of damaged cords as flexible cords and extension cords were not visually inspected before use

Issued

Jun 3, 2015

Abate by

Jun 29, 2015

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.334(a)(3)(ii): Attachment plugs and receptacles were connected or altered in a manner which prevented proper continuity of the electric equipment grounding conductor at the point where plugs were attached to receptacles:  CWC 123, Maintenance bldg. S634A: Employees were exposed to electrical shock where the grounding pin was removed from a refrigerator flexible cord end.

Issued

Jun 3, 2015

Abate by

Jun 29, 2015

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged, or marked with the identity and appropriate hazard warnings regarding the chemicals contained therein:  CWC 226, Small Arms: Employees exposed to potential injury from mislabeled cleaning chemicals used in the workplace where a break-down bottle containing a soap and water solution was labeled Isopropyl Alcohol.

Issued

Jun 3, 2015

Abate by

Jun 29, 2015

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not maintain copies of the required material safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical in the workplace:  CWC 213, Hydraulics shop: Employees were exposed to the harmful effects of the blast media used in the shop where the employer failed to maintain a copy of the material safety data sheets for the material in the workplace.

Issued

Jun 3, 2015

Abate by

Jun 29, 2015

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.23(c)(1): Open-sided floors and/or platforms four feet or more above adjacent floor or ground level were not guarded with standard railings (or equivalent) and toeboards:  CWC 223, AAV Finals: Employees were exposed to fall hazards where employees work atop assault amphibious vehicle with surfaces eight feet above the adjacent floor with unguarded edges.  The Marine Depot Production Plant Barstow was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1910.23(c)(1) which was contained in OSHA inspection number 963840, citation number 1, item number 1, and was affirmed as a final order on August 8, 2014 with respect to a workplace located at Bldg. 21668, 12th Street, Camp Pendleton, CA 92055

Issued

Jun 3, 2015

Abate by

Jun 29, 2015

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.242(b): Compressed air used for cleaning purposes was not reduced to less than 30 p.s.i.:  (a) CWC 226, Small Arms: Employees exposed to potential injury from the use of compressed air for cleaning at 60 p.s.i.  (b) CWC 223, AAV Finals: Employees exposed to potential injury from the use of compressed air for cleaning at 120 p.s.i.  (c) CWC 232, Optics Shop bldg. 595 room 7: Employees exposed to potential injury from the use of compressed air for cleaning at 110 p.s.i.  (d) In electronics shop employees exposed to potential injury from the use of compressed air for cleaning at 74 p.s.i  (e) in CWC 215 employee exposed to potential injury from the use of compressed air for cleaning at 91 p.s.i  (f) in the weld shop employees exposed to potential injury from the use of compressed air for cleaning at 85 p.s.i    The Marine Depot Production Plant Barstow was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1910.242(b) which was contained in OSHA inspection number 963840, citation number 1, item number 3, and was affirmed as a final order on August 8, 2014 with respect to a workplace located at Bldg. 21668, 12th Street, Camp Pendleton, CA 92055

Issued

Jun 3, 2015

Abate by

Jun 29, 2015

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.303(b)(2): Listed or labeled equipment was not installed and used in accordance with any instructions included in the listing and labeling:  (a) CWC 226, QC office: Employees exposed to electrical shock and burn hazards where a power strip was used to provide 120VAC service to a refrigerator and microwave oven.  (b) CWC 272, LVSR Components: Employees exposed to electrical shock and burn hazards where an extension cord was plugged into a power strip to provided 120VAC service to a radio.  (c) CWC 113, Planners Office: Employees were exposed to electrical shock where a 15 amp maximum load power strip was supplying a total amp load of 17.6 amps.   (d) CWC 221, M88 Section: Employees exposed to electrical shock and burn hazards where an extension cord reel was plugged into a power strip to provided 120VAC service to a radio.  (e) CWC 271, HMMWV: Employees exposed to electrical shock and burn hazards where a power strip was plugged into an extension cord to provided 120VAC service to a microwave oven.  (f) CWC 113, Material Expeditors room 601: Employees were exposed to electrical shock and burn hazards where a power strip was used to provide 120VAC service to a refrigerator.  (g) CWC 113, Material Expeditors room 601: Employees were exposed to electrical shock and burn hazards where a power strip was used to provide 120VAC service to a microwave oven.  (h) CWC 113, Material Expeditors bldg. 615: Employees were exposed to electrical shock and burn hazards where a power strip was plugged into an extension cord to provide 120VAC service to a computer.   (i) CWC 232, Optics Shop bldg. 595: Employees were exposed to electrical shock and burn hazards where a power strip was plugged into a work bench power strip to provide 120VAC service to equipment near the work bench.  (j) CWC 272, MRAP: Employees were exposed to electrical shock and burn hazards where a microwave oven was plugged into a power strip.  (k) CWC 273, MTVR: Employees exposed to electrical shock and burn hazards where a power strip was plugged into an extension cord to provided 120VAC service to a water heater small appliance.  (l) CWC 273, MTVR: Employees were exposed to electrical shock and burn hazards where a microwave oven was plugged into a work bench power strip.  (m) CWC 123, Maintenance bldg. S634A: Employees were exposed to electrical shock and burn hazards where two power strips were plugged into a pendent extension cord to provided 120VAC service to powered hand tool battery chargers.  (n) CWC 123, Maintenance bldg. S634A: Employees were exposed to electrical shock and burn hazards where a work bench power strip was plugged into an extension cord to provide 120VAC service to equipment near the work bench.  (o) On or about 13 January 2015 and time there prior to the employer failed to ensure that listed and labeled equipment was installed in accordance with instruction included where a power strip and extension cord were connected together in the workstation near column D-12.  (p) multiple work station in the machine shop had metal boxes on pendant cords exposing employees to electrical hazard.    The Marine Depot Production Plant Barstow was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1910.303(b)(2) which was contained in OSHA inspection number 963840, citation number 1, item number 5, and was affirmed as a final order on August 8, 2014 with respect to a workplace located at Bldg. 21668, 12th Street, Camp Pendleton, CA 92055

Issued

Jun 3, 2015

Abate by

Jun 29, 2015

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.303(b)(7)(i): Unused openings in boxes, raceways, auxiliary gutters, cabinets, equipment cases, or housings were not effectively closed to afford protection substantially equivalent to the wall of the equipment:  CWC 277, MATV: Employees were exposed to electrical shock where an unused opening in an electrical box was covered with black tape.    The Marine Depot Production Plant Barstow was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1910.303(b)(7)(i) which was contained in OSHA inspection number 963840, citation number 1, item number 6, and was affirmed as a final order on August 8, 2014 with respect to a workplace located at Bldg. 21668, 12th Street, Camp Pendleton, CA 92055

Issued

Jun 3, 2015

Abate by

Jun 29, 2015

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.304(b)(4)(ii)(B): Where connected to a branch circuit supplying two or more receptacles or outlets, a receptacle may not supply a total cord- and plug-connected load in excess of the maximum specified in Table S-4:  (a) CWC 226, Artillery Repair: Employees were exposed to electrical shock where a 20 amp branch circuit supplying two or more receptacle outlets was supplying a load of 23.1 amps where table S-4 indicates the maximum load is 16 amps.   (b) CWC 113, Planners Office: Employees were exposed to electrical shock where a 20 amp branch circuit supplying two or more receptacle outlets was supplying a load of 17.6 amps where table S-4 indicates the maximum load is 16 amps.    The Marine Depot Production Plant Barstow was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1910.304(b)(4)(ii)(B) which was contained in OSHA inspection number 963840, citation number 1, item number 9, and was affirmed as a final order on August 8, 2014 with respect to a workplace located at Bldg. 21668, 12th Street, Camp Pendleton, CA 92055

Issued

Jun 3, 2015

Abate by

Jun 29, 2015

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(h)(2)(i): Respirators were not stored to protect them from damage, contamination, dust, sunlight, extreme temperatures, excessive moisture, and damaging chemicals or were not packed or stored to prevent deformation of the facepiece and exhalation valve:  Employer failed to ensure that respirators were properly stored to keep them from being damaged, contaminated of the face piece in the paint shop and prepping shop

Issued

Jun 3, 2015

Abate by

Jun 29, 2015

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.157(c)(1): A Portable Fire Extinguisher was blocked and not available for immediate use by employees.  On or about 13 January 2015 and times there prior to the employer failed to ensure that employees had access to fire extinguishers for  immediate use, in were across from the tire shop the fie extinguisher was blocked by container.

Issued

Jun 3, 2015

Abate by

Jun 29, 2015

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.178(a)(6): The employer did not ensure that all nameplates or markings were not maintained in a legible condition:  Outside Room 607 Issue Point: A black mark on the data plate obscured the final letters and/or numbers on the data plate.

Issued

Jun 3, 2015

Abate by

Jun 17, 2015

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.243(b)(2): Airhose and hose connections used for conducting compressed air to utilization equipment was not designed for the pressure and service to which they were subjected.  On or about 13 Jan 2015 and times there prior to, the employer failed to ensure that air-hoses used in the areas near columns D-3, D-6, D-27 were adequate for the equipment and location of use, exposing employees to struck by hazard from the whipping potential of the damaged hoses.