ROME, GA —
OSHA Inspection: CYCLE TEX, INC.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of CYCLE TEX, INC. in 906 EAST HERMITAGE ROAD NE, ROME, GA 30161 (NAICS 562920). OSHA activity number 340203876.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- CYCLE TEX, INC.
- Site address
- 906 EAST HERMITAGE ROAD NE
- City
- ROME
- State
- GA
- ZIP
- 30161
- Mailing
- 906 EAST HERMITAGE ROAD NE, ROME, GA 30161
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 562920
- Employees
- 45
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
9 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.23 C01
- Issued
- Jun 4, 2015
- Abate by
- Jun 30, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $4,950 · Current $3,465 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.23(c)(1): Open-sided floors and/or platforms four feet or more above adjacent floor or ground level were not guarded with standard railings (or equivalent) and toe boards: a. Densifier Area - The open sided platform(#2) for Densifier #3 and #4 were not guarded by a standard guardrail thereby exposing employees to falls of 5 feet 8 inches to the concrete floor below. b. Densifier Area - The open sided platform for the feed conveyor for Densifier #1 and #2 was not guarded by a standard guardrail thereby exposing employees to falls of 5 feet 2 inches to the concrete floor below. c. Densifier Area - The open sided platform for the feed conveyor for Densifier #3 and #4 was not guarded by a standard guardrail thereby exposing employees to falls of 5 feet 2 inches to the concrete floor below.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3465
- — Z (S) $4950
1910.23 C03
- Issued
- Jun 4, 2015
- Abate by
- Jun 30, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.23(c)(3): Regardless of height, open-sided floors, walkways, platforms, or runways above or adjacent to dangerous equipment, pickling or galvanizing tanks, degreasing units, and similar hazards were not guarded with a standard railing and toe board. a. Densifier area - The open sided platform over the feed conveyor for the shredder on Densifiers 1 and 2 was not guarded with a standard guardrail thereby exposing the employees to dangerous equipment such as the conveyor/shredder.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.24 F
- Issued
- Jun 4, 2015
- Abate by
- Jun 30, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,970 · Current $2,079 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.24(f): Rise height and tread width were not uniform throughout any flight of stairs including any foundation structure used as one or more treads of the stairs: a. Densifier area - The stairs leading from the floor to the working level on Densifier 1 and 2 were not uniform throughout the riser height and tread thereby exposing the employees to fall and tripping hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2079
- — Z (S) $2970
1910.138 A
- Issued
- Jun 4, 2015
- Abate by
- Jun 30, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $5,940 · Current $3,564 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.138(a): The employer did not select and require employee(s) to use appropriate hand protection when employees' hands were exposed to hazards such as those from skin absorption of harmful substances; severe cuts or lacerations; severe abrasion: a. Extrusion Machines - The employees were not provided with the appropriate hand protection when working around the hot parts of the extrusion machine thereby exposing them to thermal burns.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3564
- — Z (S) $5940
1910.219 C04 I
- Issued
- Jun 4, 2015
- Abate by
- Jun 30, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $4,950 · Current $3,465 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.219(c)(4)(i): Unguarded projecting shaft end(s) did not present a smooth edge and end and projected more than one half the diameter of the shaft: a. Carpet Stripping Area - The three unguarded shaft ends on the conveyor were not covered or guarded thereby exposing employees to rotating parts hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3465
- — Z (S) $4950
1910.219 D01
- Issued
- Jun 4, 2015
- Abate by
- Jun 30, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $4,950 · Current $3,465 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.219(d)(1): Pulley(s) with part(s) seven feet or less from the floor or work platform were not guarded in accordance with the requirements specified in 29 CFR 1910.219(m) and (o): a. Densifier Area - The belt and pulley which powered Densifier #2 was not guarded or covered.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3465
- — Z (S) $4950
1910.332 B01
- Issued
- Jun 4, 2015
- Abate by
- Jun 30, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $6,930 · Current $4,851 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.332(b)(1): Employees were not trained in and familiar with the safety-related work practices required by 1910.331 through 1910.335 that pertained to their respective job assignments: a. Facility - The employer had not established a safety related work practice program consisting of procedures and protective equipment for employees who worked on or near energized parts.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4851
- — Z (S) $6930
1910.147 C04 I
- Issued
- Jun 4, 2015
- Abate by
- Aug 3, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $13,860 · Current $10,395 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section: a. Worksite - The employer did not develop document and use machine specific lockout or tagout procedures for employee protection when performing maintenance thereby exposing and resulting in employee injuries due to both hazardous energy releases and unintended machinery startup. The Cycle Tex, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(I), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 312776362, Citation number 01, Item number 02a and was affirmed as a final order on May 27, 2010, with respect to a workplace located at 906 East Hermitage Road NE, Rome, GA 30161.
Recent events (2)
- — I (R) $10395
- — Z (R) $13860
1910.215 A04
- Issued
- Jun 4, 2015
- Abate by
- Jun 30, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $13,860 · Current $8,316 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4): Grinding machinery was not used with work rest(s) to support offhand grinding work: a. Extrusion area- The Ryobi bench grinder used to sharpen the extruder knives was not equipped with a work rest thereby exposing the employees to flying parts or chips. The Cycle Tex, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1910.214(a)(4), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 312776362, citation number 01, item number 5 and was affirmed as a final order on May 27, 2010, with respect to a workplace located at 906 East Hermitage Road NE, Rome, GA 30161.
Recent events (2)
- — I (R) $8316
- — Z (R) $13860
More inspections at Cycle TEX, INC.
View Cycle TEX, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 562920)
More inspections in GA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340203876.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.