Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MILL-ROSE CO.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of MILL-ROSE CO. in 7995 TYLER BLVD., MENTOR, OH 44060 (NAICS 332999). OSHA activity number 340207331.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Mill-Rose CO. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Mill-Rose CO. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
MILL-ROSE CO.
Site address
7995 TYLER BLVD.
City
MENTOR
State
OH
ZIP
44060
Mailing
7995 TYLER BLVD., MENTOR, OH 44060
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332999
Employees
141
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 10 63 instances 106 exposed
Issued
Mar 19, 2015
Abate by
Aug 31, 2015
Penalty
Initial $6,300 · Current $4,410 Reduced
1910.212(a)(1):  One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks.        On or before 01/22/2015, the employer did not ensure that various equipment or machinery used at the site was effectively guarded.  The unguarded equipment includes:      a.  Sixty-three (63) pneumatic clamps, located throughout the production area, did not have           guarding;       b. The rotating parts (e.g.: front jaw slot, chuck valve, etc.) on sixty (60) automated        twisting machines that are actuated by a foot pedal was unguarded.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4410
  • — Z (S) $6300

1910.212 A03 II

Serious Gravity 10 63 instances 106 exposed
Issued
Mar 19, 2015
Abate by
Aug 31, 2015
Penalty
Initial $6,300 · Current $4,410 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): The point (s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s):         On or before 01/22/2015, point of operation guarding was not provided for the hydraulic shears used by operators tasked with cutting fill (material) in the production of wire brushes. Actuated by a toggle switch (that is similar to a household light switch), the employer failed to ensure that operators who utilized the presses were protected against having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4410
  • — Z (S) $6300

1910.1200 H01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 141 exposed
Issued
Mar 19, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,700 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided information and training as specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(2) and (3) on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard was introduced into their work area:       Employees were not trained on the hazardous chemicals introduced into the workplace. Chemicals include, but are not limited to, alcohol and WD-40.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $2700

View Mill-Rose CO.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340207331.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.