Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: CRUZ BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION CO.

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of CRUZ BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION CO. in 700 W. FOREST AVE., WEST CHICAGO, IL 60185 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 340215557.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Cruz Brothers Construction CO. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Cruz Brothers Construction CO. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
700 W. FOREST AVE.
City
WEST CHICAGO
State
IL
ZIP
60185
Mailing
10614 MACKINAW, CHICAGO, IL 60617
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
A
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
15
Ownership type
A

2 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.1000 A

Serious Gravity 5 4 instances 8 exposed
Issued
May 15, 2015
Abate by
Jul 2, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,250 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9010

29 CFR 1910.1000(a): The employer shall ensure that no employee is exposed to any substance at a level in excess of the exposure limit given for that substance in Table Z-1 of this standard.    On or about 2/10/15, the following employees performing tuck pointing activities at the above address were exposed to silica in excess of the Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL) and the employer did not ensure compliance was achieved to protect the employees from silicosis hazards:    a) A laborer was exposed to silica at an 8-hour time weighted average of 5.4 milligram per cubic meter, approximately 3.9 times the limit of 1.4 milligram per cubic meter; this limit is established to prevent silicosis. The sample was collected during a 410 minute sampling period, with an assumed exposure of zero for the remaining sample time of 70 minutes.    b) A laborer was exposed to silica at an 8-hour time weighted average of 0.71 milligram per cubic meter, approximately 1.0 times the limit of 0.68 milligram per cubic meter; this limit is established to prevent silicosis. The sample was collected during a 420 minute sampling period, with an assumed exposure of zero for the remaining sample time of 60 minutes.    c) A laborer was exposed to silica at an 8-hour time weighted average of 1.3 milligram per cubic meter, approximately 1.8 times the limit of .714 milligram per cubic meter; this limit is established to prevent silicosis. The sample was collected on 2-10-2015 during a 400 minute sampling period, with an assumed exposure of zero for the remaining sample time of 80 minutes.    d) A laborer was exposed to silica at an 8-hour time weighted average of 1.9 milligram per cubic meter, approximately 1.9 times the limit of 0.97 milligram per cubic meter; this limit is established to prevent silicosis. The sample was collected on 2-10-2015 during a 425 minute sampling period, with an assumed exposure of zero for the remaining sample time of 55 minutes.     Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903(d).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1250
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.1000 E

Serious Gravity 5 4 instances 8 exposed
Issued
May 15, 2015
Abate by
Aug 14, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1000(e): Feasible administrative or engineering controls were not determined and implemented to achieve compliance with the limits prescribed in 29 CFR 1910.1000(a) through (d):  On or about 2/10/15, the following employees performing tuck pointing activities at the above address were exposed to silica in excess of the Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL) and the employer did not ensure engineering controls achieved compliance to protect the employees from silicosis hazards:  a) A laborer was exposed to silica at an 8-hour time weighted average of 5.4 milligram per cubic meter, approximately 3.9 times the limit of 1.4 milligram per cubic meter; this limit is established to prevent silicosis. The sample was collected during a 410 minute sampling period, with an assumed exposure of zero for the remaining sample time of 70 minutes.  b) A laborer was exposed to silica at an 8-hour time weighted average of 0.71 milligram per cubic meter, approximately 1.0 times the limit of 0.68 milligram per cubic meter; this limit is established to prevent silicosis. The sample was collected during a 420 minute sampling period, with an assumed exposure of zero for the remaining sample time of 60 minutes.  c) A laborer was exposed to silica at an 8-hour time weighted average of 1.3 milligram per cubic meter, approximately 1.8 times the limit of .714 milligram per cubic meter; this limit is established to prevent silicosis. The sample was collected on 2-10-2015 during a 400 minute sampling period, with an assumed exposure of zero for the remaining sample time of 80 minutes.  d) A laborer was exposed to silica at an 8-hour time weighted average of 1.9 milligram per cubic meter, approximately 1.9 times the limit of 0.97 milligram per cubic meter; this limit is established to prevent silicosis. The sample was collected on 2-10-2015 during a 425 minute sampling period, with an assumed exposure of zero for the remaining sample time of 55 minutes.  Step 1: Submit to the Area Director a written, detail plan of abatement outlining the implementation of engineering measures to control employees exposure to hazardous substances as referenced in this citation. This plan shall include, at a minimum, target dates for the following actions which must be consistent with the abatement dates required by this citation:  a. Evaluation of engineering/administrative controls options; b. Select of optimum control methods and completion of design; c. Procurement, installation and operation of selected control measures; d. Testing and acceptance or medication/redesign of controls.  Step 2: Feasible engineering controls include, but are not limited to:  -Water suppression system cutting and/or grinding tools to reduce or eliminate silica dust exposure.  Date by which Step 1 must be abated 6/15/15 Date by which Step 2 must be abated 7/15/15  Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903(d).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View Cruz Brothers Construction CO.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340215557.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.