EL PASO, TX —
OSHA Inspection: RICARDO MAESE
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of RICARDO MAESE in 6210 MONTANA AVE. (EL PASO INN), EL PASO, TX 79905 (NAICS 238310). OSHA activity number 340216217.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- RICARDO MAESE
- Site address
- 6210 MONTANA AVE. (EL PASO INN)
- City
- EL PASO
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 79905
- Mailing
- 1609 GLOBE CIR., EL PASO, TX 79915
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238310
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.451 B01
- Issued
- Mar 12, 2015
- Abate by
- Mar 24, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii). On or about January 29, 2015, an employees was observed painting a commercial building roof flashing while working from a frame scaffold platform that was not fully planked, exposing employees to fall hazards exceeding 10 feet.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.451 C02 II
- Issued
- Mar 12, 2015
- Abate by
- Mar 24, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2)(ii): Unstable objects were used to support scaffolds or platform units. On or about January 29, 2015, and times prior thereto, an employee was observed on a frame scaffold platform painting the building roof flashing with heights above 10 feet from the ground, where the scaffold baseplates were supported by unstable mudsills, and uneven ground. This condition made the scaffold unstable and exposed employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.451 E08
- Issued
- Mar 12, 2015
- Abate by
- Mar 24, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $2,400
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(8): Direct access to or from another surface was used when the scaffold was more than 14 inches (36 cm) horizontally from the other surface: On or about January 29, 2014, and at times prior thereto, an employee was stepping from one scaffold working platform to another when the distance between them where more than 14 inches apart at heights of above 10 feet from the ground. This condition expose employee to fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2400
1926.451 G04 I
- Issued
- Mar 12, 2015
- Abate by
- Mar 24, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(4)(i): Guardrail systems were not installed along all open sides and ends of platforms before being released for use by employees other than erection/dismantling crews. On or about January 29, 2015, employees working on a fabricated frame scaffold were not protected from falling bya guardrail system, exposing them to falls exceeding 10 feet.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.451 H01
- Issued
- Mar 12, 2015
- Abate by
- Mar 24, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(h)(1): Employees on a scaffold were not provided with additional protection from falling hand tools, debris, and other small objects through the installation of toeboards, screens, or through the erection of debris nets, catch platforms, or canopy structures that contain or deflect the falling objects. On or about January 29, 2015, and times prior thereto, an employee was observed on a frame scaffold platform painting the building roof flashing at heights above 10 feet from ground that was not provided with toe boards. This condition exposed employees to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $1200
1926.452 C02
- Issued
- Mar 12, 2015
- Abate by
- Mar 24, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.452(c)(2): Frames and panels were not braced by cross, horizontal, or diagonal braces, or combination thereof, which would secure vertical members together laterally, and the cross braces were not of such length as would automatically square. On or about January 29, 2015, and times prior thereto, two employees were observed on a frame scaffold platform painting the building roof flashing and installing wall insulation at heights above 10 feet from ground were some of the vertical panels were not provided with cross braces as to automatically square the panels. This condition exposed employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.452 C04
- Issued
- Mar 12, 2015
- Abate by
- Mar 24, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.452(c)(4): End frames of tubular welded frame scaffolding were not locked together vertically by use of pins or equivalent means in areas where uplift could occur. On or about January 29, 2015, and times prior thereto, two employees were observed on a frame scaffold platform painting the building roof flashing at heights above 10 feet from ground where frame uprights were not locked together vertically by the use of pins or equivalent means in areas where uplift could occur. This condition exposed employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.454 A
- Issued
- Mar 12, 2015
- Abate by
- Mar 24, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $400 · Current $400
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards. On or about January 29, 2015, the employer did not trained each employee who perform work on a scaffold by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with frame scaffold being use and understand the procedures to control or minimize the hazards. This condition exposed employees to struck-by and fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $400
More inspections at Ricardo Maese
View Ricardo Maese's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238310)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340216217.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.