CEDAR GROVE, NJ —
OSHA Inspection: CONTRACT FILLING, INC.
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of CONTRACT FILLING, INC. in 10 CLIFFSIDE DR., CEDAR GROVE, NJ 07009 (NAICS 325620). OSHA activity number 340217231.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- CONTRACT FILLING, INC.
- Site address
- 10 CLIFFSIDE DR.
- City
- CEDAR GROVE
- State
- NJ
- ZIP
- 07009
- Mailing
- 10 CLIFFSIDE DR., CEDAR GROVE, NJ 07009
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 325620
- Employees
- 170
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
9 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.119 C01
- Issued
- Jul 22, 2015
- Abate by
- Sep 8, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $6,300 · Current $4,410 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(c)(1): The employer did not develop a written plan of action regarding the implementation of the employee participation required 29 CFR 1910.119: a) Compounding Area The employer had no written plan of action for employee participation in process safety management. Employees manufactured perfume and cologne using denatured alcohol, a flammable liquid. Processes occurring during the inspection included, but were not limited to pumping and mixing/agitation of flammable liquids. The quantity of flammable liquids in the process is 14,000lbs. Violation occurred on or about 1/22/2015.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4410
- — Z (S) $6300
1910.119 D02 I D
- Issued
- Jul 22, 2015
- Abate by
- Sep 8, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $6,300 · Current $4,410 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(2)(i)(D): Process safety information pertaining to the technology of the process did not include the safe upper and lower limits for such items as flows: a) Compounding Areas The employer did not develop process safety information pertaining to the technology of the processes used by employees in the manufacture of perfume/cologne including the safe upper and lower limits for the transfer meter pump's flow rate. Employees manufactured perfume/cologne using denatured alcohol, a flammable liquid. Processes occurring during the inspection included, but were not limited to, pumping and mixing/agitation of 14,000lbs of flammable liquids. Violation occurred on or about 1/22/2015.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4410
- — Z (S) $6300
1910.119 D02 I E
- Issued
- Jul 22, 2015
- Abate by
- Sep 8, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(2)(i)(E): Process safety information pertaining to the technology of the process did not include an evaluation of the consequence of deviations, including those affecting the safety and health of employees: a) Compounding Areas The employer did not evaluate the consequences of deviation during transfer of flammable liquids from storage tanks to process vessels. Deviation during transfer could include overflow of process vessels. Employees manufactured perfume/cologne using denatured alcohol, a flammable liquid. Processes occurring during the inspection included, but were not limited to, pumping and mixing/agitation of 14,000lbs of flammable liquids. Violation occurred on or about 1/22/2015.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.119 D03 I B
- Issued
- Jul 22, 2015
- Abate by
- Sep 8, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $6,300 · Current $4,410 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i)(B): Process safety information pertaining to the equipment in the process did not include the piping and instrumentation diagrams (P&IDs): a) Compounding Area The employer did not have the required P&IDs for the process equipment. Employees manufactured perfumes/colognes using denatured alcohol, a flammable liquid. Processes occurring during the inspection included, but were not limited to, pumping and mixing/agitation of 14,000lbs of flammable liquids. Violation occurred on or about 1/22/2015.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4410
- — Z (S) $6300
1910.119 E01
- Issued
- Jul 22, 2015
- Abate by
- Sep 8, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $6,300 · Current $4,410 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(e)(1): The employer did not perform an initial process hazard analysis (hazard evaluation) on processes covered by 29 CFR 1910.119: a) Compounding area The employer did not perform an initial process hazard analysis on the covered process used by employees in the manufacture of perfume/cologne, including but limited to pumping and mixing/agitation of flammable liquids. The quantity of flammable liquid in the covered process is 14,000lbs. Violation occurred on or about 1/22/2015.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4410
- — Z (S) $6300
1910.119 F01
- Issued
- Jul 22, 2015
- Abate by
- Sep 8, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $6,300 · Current $4,410 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1): The employer did not develop and implement written operating procedures that provided clear instructions for safely conducting activities involved in each covered process consistent the safety information and which address the elements listed in 29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1)(i) through (f)(1)(v): a) Compounding Area The employer did not develop and implement written operating procedures, including but not limited to, emergency shut down, temporary operations, and start up after emergency shutdown . Employees manufactured perfume/cologne using denatured alcohol, a flammable liquid. Processes occurring during the inspection included, but were not limited,pumping and mixing/agitation of flammable liquids. The quantity of the flammable liquids in the process is 14,000lbs. Violation occurred on or about 1/22/2015.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4410
- — Z (S) $6300
1910.119 G01 I
- Issued
- Jul 22, 2015
- Abate by
- Sep 8, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $6,300 · Current $4,410 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(g)(1)(i): The employer did not train each employee involved in the operating process, in a overview of the process and in the operating procedures as specified in paragraph (f) of 29 CFR 1910.119: a) Compounding areas Employees manufactured perfume/cologne using alcohol, a flammable liquid, without receiving training in the general requirements of the process safety standard. Processes occurring during the time of the inspection included, but were not limited to, pumping, and mixing/agitation of flammable liquids. The quantity of flammable liquids in the process is 14,000lbs. Violation occurred on or about 1/22/2015.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4410
- — Z (S) $6300
1910.119 J02
- Issued
- Jul 22, 2015
- Abate by
- Sep 8, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $6,300 · Current $4,410 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(2): The employer did not establish or implement written procedures to maintain the on-going integrity of process equipment: a) Compounding area The employer did not establish and implement written mechanical integrity procedures for employees responsible for maintenance of process equipment, including but not limited to conservation vent/flame arrestor, as part of the safety system. Employees manufactured perfume/cologne, a flammable liquid. Processes occurring during the inspection includes, but were not limited to, pumping and mixing/agitation of flammable liquids. The quantity of the flammable liquids in the process is 14,000lbs. Violation occurred on or about 1/22/2015.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4410
- — Z (S) $6300
1910.147 C04 I
- Issued
- Jul 22, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $6,300 · Current $4,410 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section: a) Line # 10 Employees were repairing main drive of Line #10 motor without locking out energy sources. Violation observed on or about 2/11/2015.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4410
- — Z (S) $6300
More inspections at Contract Filling, INC.
View Contract Filling, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 325620)
More inspections in NJ
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340217231.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.