Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: TEXAS PREMIER RESOURCES, LLC

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of TEXAS PREMIER RESOURCES, LLC in 133 PRIVATE ROAD 9915, KARNES CITY, TX 78118 (NAICS 213112). OSHA activity number 340218569.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Texas Premier Resources, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Texas Premier Resources, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
133 PRIVATE ROAD 9915
City
KARNES CITY
State
TX
ZIP
78118
Mailing
133 PRIVATE ROAD 9915, KARNES CITY, TX 78118
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
213112
Employees
90
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.132 D02

Serious Gravity 10 4 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Jul 23, 2015
Abate by
Aug 13, 2015
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $3,430 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification which included the requirements as outlined in 29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2):      At this establishment, written verification of a workplace hazard assessment for required personal protective equipment was not completed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3430
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.252 B03

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 23, 2015
Abate by
Aug 13, 2015
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.252(b)(3): Employees exposed to the hazards created by welding, cutting, or brazing operations were not protected by personal protective equipment in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.132:     At this establishment employees tasked with performing cutting operations utilizing a cutting torch to remove bolts were not wearing face shield, leather gloves or fire retardant clothing exposing the employees burns/fire hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Jul 23, 2015
Abate by
Aug 13, 2015
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $3,430 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:    At this establishment, a written respiratory protection program with specific procedures was not created and implemented for the protection of employees who wore half face, tight fitting respirators. Employees opening hatches of tanker trailers and working in and around the trailers were potentially exposed to H2S and other gases or vapors.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3430
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 23, 2015
Abate by
Aug 13, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:    At this employer's job site employees were provided with half-face, tight-fitting respirators for use in and around the wash out area to wash the interior of tanker trailers and to drivers who load up tanker trailers with oilfield drilling fluids at remote locations. The employees using the half-face, tight-fitting respirators were not administered a medical evaluation to determine their ability to use the respirators.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.134 F01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 23, 2015
Abate by
Aug 13, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):    At this establishment, at the wash area, employees wear half-face, tight-fitting respirators when washing the tanker trailers without being administered  a qualitative or quantitative fit test. Employees are exposed to vapors from hazardous chemicals.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.151 B

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 23, 2015
Abate by
Aug 13, 2015
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.151(b): There was neither an infirmary, clinic, or hospital used for the treatment of all injured employees in near proximity to the workplace nor a person or persons adequately trained to render first aid:  At this establishment, at the mechanic shop, employees performing cutting operations did not have an employee whom was adequately trained to render first aid.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.252 A02 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 23, 2015
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $3,430 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.252(a)(2)(ii): Suitable extinguishing equipment was not maintained in a state of readiness for instant use:    At this maintenance shop, employees utilizing a cutting torch to remove bolts from a flange did not have a fire extinguisher readily available.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3430
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.252 A02 VI C

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 23, 2015
Abate by
Aug 13, 2015
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $3,430 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.252(a)(2)(vi)(C): Cutting or welding was permitted in the presence of explosive atmospheres (mixture of flammable gases, vapors, liquids, or dusts with air), or explosive atmospheres that could develop inside uncleaned or improperly prepared tanks or equipment which had previously contained such materials, or that could develop in areas with an accumulation of flammable vapors:     On or about January 27, 2015, the employer did not prohibit cutting or welding in the presence of explosive atmospheres (mixtures of flammable gases, vapors, liquids, or dusts with air), or explosive atmospheres that may develop inside uncleaned or improperly prepared tanks or equipment which have previously contained such materials. The employer permitted cutting bolts off a butterfly valve, using a torch, from a tank trailer which was used to transport flammable oil field liquid waste.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3430
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.253 B04

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jul 23, 2015
Abate by
Aug 13, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $1,470 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.253(b)(4): Oxygen cylinders were stored near acetylene or other fuel-gas cylinders:      At this mechanic shop, the employer had stored the oxygen and acetylene tanks together on mobile holder inside the mechanic shop.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1470
  • — Z (S) $2100

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 23, 2015
Abate by
Aug 13, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,960 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:    At this establishment, the employer did not develop and implement a hazard communication program. At the maintenance shop, employees working with various chemicals such as gasoline, diesel fuel, brake fluid, batteries, and oxygen and acetylene gases.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1960
  • — Z (S) $2800

View Texas Premier Resources, LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340218569.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.