Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: SCHMIDT TOOL & MANUFACTURING COMPANY, LLC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of SCHMIDT TOOL & MANUFACTURING COMPANY, LLC in 13967 FM 1097 WEST, WILLIS, TX 77318 (NAICS 332710). OSHA activity number 340220383.

Watch Schmidt Tool & Manufacturing Company, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Schmidt Tool & Manufacturing Company, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
13967 FM 1097 WEST
City
WILLIS
State
TX
ZIP
77318
Mailing
13967 FM 1097 WEST, WILLIS, TX 77318
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332710
Employees
28
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 10 5 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4900.00 · Current $2450.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:    The employer does not guard all the rotating parts of machines to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area.         a. This violation occurred on or about January 28, 2015, in the Fabrication Shop where employees were exposed to struck-by and caught-by hazards when operating a Puma 240L CNC metal lathe without interlocking door guards.          b. This violation occurred on or about January 28, 2015, in the Fabrication Shop where employees were exposed to struck-by and caught-by hazards when operating a Puma 300 CNC metal lathe without interlocking door guards.       c. This violation occurred on or about January 28, 2015, in the Fabrication Shop where employees were exposed to struck-by and caught-by hazards when operating a manual Kingston HD-22120 metal lathe without a chuck guard.       d. This violation occurred on or about January 28, 2015, in the Fabrication Shop where employees were exposed to struck-by and caught-by hazards when operating a manual Victor 1630 metal lathe without a chuck guard.             e. This violation occurred on or about January 28, 2015, in the Fabrication Shop where employees were exposed to struck-by and caught-by hazards when operating a manual Victor 1660B metal lathe without a chuck guard.          Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that all machines that have exposed rotating parts are guarded.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2450
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.212 A03 II

Serious Gravity 5 5 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3500.00 · Current $1750.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s):    The employer does not guard the point of operation on machines whose operation exposes employees to injury.       a. This violation occurred on or about January 28, 2015, in the Fabrication Shop where employees were exposed to struck-by and caught-by hazards while operating a Bridgeport Series I milling machine without a point of operation guard.       b. This violation occurred on or about January 28, 2015, in the Fabrication Shop where employees were exposed to struck-by and caught-by hazards while operating a Bridgeport milling machine, serial number 449140588X, without a point of operation guard.       c. This violation occurred on or about January 28, 2015, in the Fabrication Shop where employees were exposed to struck-by and caught-by hazards while operating a Bridgeport milling machine, serial number J111496, without a point of operation guard.            d. This violation occurred on or about January 28, 2015, in the Fabrication Shop where employees were exposed to struck-by and caught-by hazards while operating a Bridgeport milling machine, serial number J310702, without a point of operation guard.      e. This violation occurred on or about January 28, 2015, in the Fabrication Shop where employees were exposed to struck-by and caught-by hazards while operating a Kingston brand milling machine without a point of operation guard.      Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that all the point of operations on all machines are guarded.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1750
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.215 A04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3500.00 · Current $1750.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4): On offhand grinding machines, work rests were not used to support the work and/or were not kept adjusted closely to the wheel with a maximum opening of one-eighth inch to prevent the work from being jammed between the wheel and the rest, which may cause wheel breakage:     The employer does not ensure that work rests on all offhand grinding machines are adjusted closely to the wheel with a maximum opening of one-eighth inch. This violation occurred on or about January 28, 2015, in the Fabrication Shop where employees were exposed to struck-by hazards when operating an unknown brand name bench grinder without the work rests adjusted to the wheel with a maximum opening of one-eighth inch.      Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that all abrasive wheel machinery are used and maintained in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.215.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1750
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.215 B09

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): The distance between the abrasive wheel periphery(s) and the adjustable tongue or the end of the safety guard peripheral member at the top exceeded one fourth inch:  The employer does not ensure that on all offhand grinding machines a tongue guard is installed and adjusted to one fourth inch or less from the abrasive wheel or that the distance between the wheel and the end of the safety guard peripheral member at the top of the abrasive wheel does not exceed one fourth inch. This violation occurred on or about January 28, 2015, in the Fabrication Shop where employees were exposed to struck-by hazards when operating an unknown brand bench grinder without a tongue guard to close the gap that exceeded one forth inch between the grinding wheel and the safety guard peripheral member at the top of the abrasive wheel.    Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that all abrasive wheel machinery are used and maintained in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.215.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340220383.