KENOSHA, WI —
OSHA Inspection: INDUSTRIAL TOOLZ INC
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of INDUSTRIAL TOOLZ INC in 5600 99TH AVE, KENOSHA, WI 53144 (NAICS 332312). OSHA activity number 340220953.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- INDUSTRIAL TOOLZ INC
- Site address
- 5600 99TH AVE
- City
- KENOSHA
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 53144
- Mailing
- 5600 99TH AVE, KENOSHA, WI 53144
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332312
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 C
- Issued
- Jul 24, 2015
- Abate by
- Aug 12, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c): The employer did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program with required worksite-specific procedures and elements for required respirator use: (a) On or about January 30th, 2015, the employer failed to develop and implement a respiratory protection program for employees allowed to wear elastomeric and disposable respirators.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1000
- — Z (S) $1600
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Jul 24, 2015
- Abate by
- Aug 12, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: (a) The employer did not provide a medical evaluation prior to allowing usage of an elastomeric respirator.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $1600
1910.134 F01
- Issued
- Jul 24, 2015
- Abate by
- Aug 12, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT): (a)The employer failed to ensure that employees using an tight fitting elastomeric half face respirator was fit tested prior to usage.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 H02 I
- Issued
- Jul 24, 2015
- Abate by
- Aug 12, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(h)(2)(i): Respirators were not stored to protect them from damage, contamination, dust, sunlight, extreme temperatures, excessive moisture, and damaging chemicals or were not packed or stored to prevent deformation of the facepiece and exhalation valve: (a) Respirators stored on the work bench in the paint area were not protected from contamination and dust.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $1600
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Jul 24, 2015
- Abate by
- Aug 12, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: (a) On or about January 30th, 2015 a written hazard communication program was not available upon request. The employer paints metal ramps after fabrication with employees exposed to chemicals during the painting process.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1000
- — Z (S) $1600
1910.1200 G08
- Issued
- Jul 24, 2015
- Abate by
- Aug 12, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not maintain copies of the required material safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical in the workplace: (a) The employer did not maintain nor have available copies of material safety data sheets for chemical products used by employees.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 H03 IV
- Issued
- Jul 24, 2015
- Abate by
- Aug 12, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv): The details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer, including an explanation of the labels received on shipped containers and the workplace labeling system used by their employer; the safety data sheet, including the order of information and how employees can obtain and use the appropriate hazard information. (a) On or about January 30th, 2015, the employer did not train employees on the new Globally Harmonized System of chemical classification and labeling.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 F09
- Issued
- Jul 24, 2015
- Abate by
- Jul 30, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(9): The employer did not ensure that labels or other forms of warning were legible, in English, and prominently displayed on the container, or readily available in the work area throughout each work shift: (a) On or about March 10th, 2015 the employer did not ensure that all bottles were labeled as to it's contents and hazards. A Gatorade bottle was used to store a milk like machining fluid.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332312)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340220953.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.