Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: LINDALE MACHINE & TOOL, INC.

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of LINDALE MACHINE & TOOL, INC. in 134 TEATS STREET SE, LINDALE, GA 30147 (NAICS 332710). OSHA activity number 340258276.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Lindale Machine & Tool, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Lindale Machine & Tool, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
134 TEATS STREET SE
City
LINDALE
State
GA
ZIP
30147
Mailing
P.O. BOX 247, LINDALE, GA 30147
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332710
Employees
8
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.36 D01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Mar 30, 2015
Abate by
Apr 23, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $720 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.36(d)(1): Employee(s) were not able to open an exit route door from the inside at all times without keys, tools, or special knowledge:  a) South side of the building - There was an exit door that was locked internally with a deadbolt, preventing employees from exiting the building, exposing employees to smoke inhalation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $720
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.37 B02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Mar 30, 2015
Abate by
Apr 23, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(2): Each exit was not clearly visible and marked by a sign reading "Exit":  a)  Throughout the facility, the exit doors were not marked with the word "Exit", exposing employees to smoke inhalation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.212 A03 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 30, 2015
Abate by
Apr 23, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $960 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s):   a)  In the Production Area - The Enco lathe did not have a guard in place at the point of operation, exposing the machinists to severe lacerations when in operation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $960
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Mar 30, 2015
Abate by
May 14, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $720 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  a)  Throughout the facility - The employer did not establish a written hazard communication program for the employees exposed to hazardous substances such as, but not limited to, Oakflo DSS T-Tech (containing, naphthenic petroleum distillates, triethanolamine, and aminomethylpropanol), Precision cleaner-degreaser (containing isopropyl alcohol, borax, and Disodium Pyrophosphate) and propane, exposing the employees to respiratory, eye, and skin irritations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $720
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.1200 G01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Mar 30, 2015
Abate by
May 14, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): Employers did not have a safety data sheet in the workplace for each hazardous chemical which they use:  a)  Throughout the facility - The employer did not provide the safety data sheets (SDS) for employees who were required to work with chemicals, such as but not limited to:  Oakflo DSS T-Tech (containing, naphthenic petroleum distillates, triethanolamine, and aminomethylpropanol), Precision cleaner-degreaser (containing isopropyl alcohol, borax, and Disodium Pyrophosphate) and propane, exposing employees to respiratory, eye, and skin irritations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Mar 30, 2015
Abate by
May 14, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  a)  Throughout the facility -  The employer did not provide training, to include the new hazard communication standard Global Harmonized System (GHS) that became effective December 1, 2013, to employees exposed to hazardous substances such as, but not limited to, Oakflo DSS T-Tech (containing, naphthenic petroleum distillates, triethanolamine, and aminomethylpropanol), Precision cleaner-degreaser (containing isopropyl alcohol, borax, and Disodium Pyrophosphate) and propane, exposing employees to respiratory, eye, and skin irritations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.38 B

Other-than-serious 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Mar 30, 2015
Abate by
May 14, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.38(b): An emergency action plan was not established and verbally explained to employees:  a)  Throughout the facility, the employer did not ensure that a written emergency action plan was in place in the event of a fire, tornado, or other disasters, exposing employees to smoke inhalation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.178 L04 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Mar 30, 2015
Abate by
May 14, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not being conducted at least once every three years:  a)  The employer did not certify that the forklift operators were evaluated at least every three years, exposing employees to minor cuts and contusions.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Lindale Machine & Tool, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340258276.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.