PACIFIC, MO —
OSHA Inspection: LOWELL MANUFACTURING COMPANY INC.
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of LOWELL MANUFACTURING COMPANY INC. in 100 INTEGRAM DRIVE, PACIFIC, MO 63069 (NAICS 337215). OSHA activity number 340294271.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- LOWELL MANUFACTURING COMPANY INC.
- Site address
- 100 INTEGRAM DRIVE
- City
- PACIFIC
- State
- MO
- ZIP
- 63069
- Mailing
- 100 INTEGRAM DRIVE, PACIFIC, MO 63069
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 337215
- Employees
- 71
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.95 C01
- Issued
- Apr 3, 2015
- Abate by
- May 20, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $2,450 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1): A continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.95(c) through (n) was not instituted when employee noise exposures equaled or exceeded an 8 hour time weighted average sound level (TWA) of 85 dBA: For the Powder Coat Painter who was exposed to a recorded personal noise dosimeter level of 68.5% on 2/4/2015. This was equivalent to a sound level of 87.2 dBA for an 8-hour time-weighted average (TWA) for the 451 minutes sampled and zero exposure for the 29 minutes not sampled.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2450
- — Z (S) $3500
1910.133 A01
- Issued
- Apr 3, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,960 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards: Inside of the Assembly area, employee(s) were observed operating hand held portable power tools without wearing suitable eye protection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1960
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.136 A
- Issued
- Apr 3, 2015
- Abate by
- May 20, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.136(a): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used protective footwear when working in areas where there was a danger of foot injuries due to falling or rolling objects, or objects piercing the sole: Inside the production area, the operator of the 10 Ton overhead crane was wearing sneakers.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 C02 II
- Issued
- Apr 3, 2015
- Abate by
- May 20, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(ii): The employer did not establish and implement those elements of a written respiratory protection program necessary to ensure that any employee using a respirator voluntarily was medically able to use that respirator, and that the respirator was cleaned, stored, and maintained so that its use did not present a health hazard to the user: In the Powder Coat Room, the powder coat painter(s) used a 3M 6001 full face respirator (OV cartridges with P95 filters) on a voluntary basis to intermittently spray powder coat on large items inside the booth. In addition, the powder coat painter(s) used a 3M 8511 N95 respirator to clean the booth. The employer did not have a written respiratory protection program and medical evaluation(s) had not been conducted for the powder coat painter(s).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.333 A02
- Issued
- Apr 3, 2015
- Abate by
- May 20, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $3,430 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.333(a)(2): Where exposed live parts were not de-energized, other safety related work practices were not used to protect employees who could be exposed to the electrical hazards involved: Inside of the Assembly area, on or about the Holidays 2014, an employee was rewiring the conveyor line, receptacles, glue pot and workbenches. The employer failed to provide employee(s) with adequate safety related work practices while working on the R2 electrical panel box (120/208V, 200 amp) live.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3430
- — Z (S) $4900
1910.335 A01 I
- Issued
- Apr 3, 2015
- Abate by
- May 20, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.335(a)(1)(i): Employees working in areas where there were potential electrical hazards were not provided with electrical protective equipment that was appropriate for the specific parts of the body that needed to be protected and for the work being performed: Inside of the Assembly area, on or about the Holidays 2014, an employee was rewiring the conveyor line, receptacles, glue pot and workbenches without suitable personal protective equipment. He was working on R2 electical panel box (120/208V, 200 amp) live. The employee was only wearing safety glasses.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.335 A02 II
- Issued
- Apr 3, 2015
- Abate by
- May 20, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.335(a)(2)(ii): Protective shields, protective barriers, or insulating materials were not used to protect each employee from shock, burns, or other electrically related injuries while that employee was working near exposed energized parts: Inside of the Assembly area, on or about the Holidays 2014, an employee was rewiring the conveyor line, receptacles, glue pot and workbenches without protective barriers, shields or insulating materials in place. He was working on R2 electrical panel box (120/208V, 200 amp) live.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at Lowell Manufacturing Company INC.
View Lowell Manufacturing Company INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 337215)
More inspections in MO
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340294271.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.