Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: BODY PROS AUTO COLLISION

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of BODY PROS AUTO COLLISION in 4031 VAN BUREN AVE., EL PASO, TX 79930 (NAICS 811121). OSHA activity number 340306075.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Body Pros Auto Collision — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Body Pros Auto Collision is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
4031 VAN BUREN AVE.
City
EL PASO
State
TX
ZIP
79930
Mailing
4031 VAN BUREN AVE., EL PASO, TX 79930
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
811121
Employees
12
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.22 A03

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Jul 14, 2015
Abate by
Aug 21, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $600 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.22(a)(3): Floors, working places, and passageways were not kept free from protruding nails, splinters, holes, or loose boards.    Body Shop: On or about February 6, 2015, a hole in the utility room floor was not properly guarded and/or covered. This condition exposed the employees to trip hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $600
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.133 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 14, 2015
Abate by
Aug 21, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation:    Body shop: On or about February 6, 2015, and at times prior thereto, one employee conducting body work in the shop using a hand grinder, was not wearing safety glasses. This condition exposed the employee to an eye injury.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $800
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 14, 2015
Abate by
Sep 25, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:    Body Shop: On or about February 6, 2015 and at times prior thereto, the employer failed to have a respiratory program for employees when working with chemicals such as paints and solvents. Employees are exposed to respiratory and/or health hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $800
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 14, 2015
Abate by
Sep 25, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:    Body Shop: On or about February 6, 2015 and at times prior thereto, the employer failed to have the employees medically evaluated before wearing a half-mask respirator when working with chemicals such as paints and solvents. Employees are exposed to respiratory and/or health hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 14, 2015
Abate by
Sep 25, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator were not annually fit tested:    Body Shop: On or about February 6, 2015 and at times prior thereto, the employer failed to have the employees fit tested prior to using the half-mask respirator when working with chemicals such as paints and solvents. Employees are exposed to respiratory and/or health hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 14, 2015
Abate by
Sep 25, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1): The employer did not provide respirator training that would ensure each employee could demonstrate knowledge of items in section (i)-(vii):    Body Shop: On or about February 6, 2015 and at times prior thereto, the employer did not provide respiratory training to employees prior to using half-mask respirators when working with chemicals such as paints and solvents. Employees are exposed to respiratory and/or health hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.303 F02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Jul 14, 2015
Abate by
Aug 21, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $600 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(f)(2): Each service, feeder, and branch circuit, at its disconnecting means or overcurrent device, was not legibly marked to indicate its purpose, nor located and arranged so the purpose was evident:    Body Shop: On or about February 6, 2015 and at times prior thereto, The employer failed to mark the circuits in the breaker box located in the utility room as required. This condition exposed employees to electrical hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $600
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.303 G02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Jul 14, 2015
Abate by
Aug 21, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(2)(i): Live parts of electric equipment operating at 50 volts or more were not guarded against accidental contact by approved cabinets or other forms of approved enclosures, or other means listed under this provision:    Body Shop: On or about February 6, 2015 and at prior times thereto, the employer failed to have the electrician reattach the dead front to breaker box and exposed live electrical parts to employee contact. This condition exposed the employees to contact to electrical shock hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.305 D02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Jul 14, 2015
Abate by
Aug 21, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(d)(2): Panelboards were not mounted in cabinets, cutout boxes, or enclosures designed for the purpose and/or were not dead front:    Body Shop: On or about February 6, 2015 and at prior times thereto, the electric circuit breaker box was missing the dead front and exposed live electrical parts to employee contact. This condition exposed the employees to contact to electrical shock hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.305 J01

Other-than-serious 2 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Jul 14, 2015
Abate by
Aug 21, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.305(j)(1): Fixtures, lamp-holders, lamps, rosettes, and receptacles had live parts normally exposed to employee contact:    Body Shop: On or about February 6, 2015 and at prior times thereto, two electrical outlet boxes were missing the faceplate covers. This condition exposed the employees to electrical burn and/or shock hazards.    1.  Outlet box in utility room was missing an outlet cover.  2.  Outlet box in lounge room was missing an outlet cover.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Body Pros Auto Collision's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340306075.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.