JANESVILLE, WI —
OSHA Inspection: B.C. CONSTRUCTION LLC
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of B.C. CONSTRUCTION LLC in 4121 COUNTY ROAD F, JANESVILLE, WI 53548 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 340355874.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- B.C. CONSTRUCTION LLC
- Site address
- 4121 COUNTY ROAD F
- City
- JANESVILLE
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 53548
- Mailing
- 523 MARINO AVENUE, DELAVAN, WI 53115
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Apr 1, 2015
- Abate by
- Apr 9, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $400 · Current $400
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section. The employer failed to provide information certifying that employees had received training on fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $400
1926.501 B02 I
- Issued
- Feb 18, 2015
- Abate by
- Mar 13, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $980 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(2)(i): Each employee who was constructing a leading edge 6 feet or more above lower levels was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems: Note: If the employer could demonstrate that it was infeasible or created a greater hazard to use these systems, a fall protection plan meeting the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502 should have been developed and implemented. On or about February 11, 2015, employees installing roof sheathing on a storage unit at a height greater than six feet were doing so without fall protection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $980
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Feb 18, 2015
- Abate by
- Mar 4, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $700 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: On or about February 11, 2015, employees exposed to fall hazards were not trained on how to recognize and mitigate those fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $700
- — Z (S) $2000
More inspections at B.C. Construction LLC
View B.C. Construction LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340355874.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.