Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: BANKER GRATING, LLC

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of BANKER GRATING, LLC in 7100 WEST CALUMET RD., MILWAUKEE, WI 53223 (NAICS 332323). OSHA activity number 340367275.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Banker Grating, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Banker Grating, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
BANKER GRATING, LLC
Site address
7100 WEST CALUMET RD.
City
MILWAUKEE
State
WI
ZIP
53223
Mailing
7100 WEST CALUMET RD., MILWAUKEE, WI 53223
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332323
Employees
27
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 8, 2015
Abate by
May 4, 2015
Penalty
Initial $4,500 · Current $3,150 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative:  (a) The employer failed to implement a control of hazardous energy program (lockout/tagout) for employees which regularly conduct maintenance activities on machinery in the facility. This exposed employees to amputation hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3150
  • — Z (S) $4500

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 8, 2015
Abate by
May 4, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:  (a) The employer failed to develop and implement written energy control procedures for machinery with more than one energy source. This exposed employees to amputation hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 C07 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 8, 2015
Abate by
May 4, 2015
Penalty
Initial $4,500 · Current $3,150 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i): The employer did not provide training to ensure that the purpose and function of the energy control program are understood by employees and that the knowledge and skills required for the safe application, usage, and removal of the energy controls are acquired by employees:  (a) The employer did not provide employees engaged in servicing/maintaining and or un-jamming machinery/equipment at the facility with training on the proper techniques, means, and methods to isolate/de-energize/dissipate hazardous energy. This exposed employees to entanglement and amputation hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3150
  • — Z (S) $4500

1910.178 L02 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Apr 8, 2015
Abate by
May 26, 2015
Penalty
Initial $4,500 · Current $3,150 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(2)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training consisting of a combination of formal instruction (e.g., lecture, discussion, interactive computer learning, video tape, written material), practical training (demonstrations performed by the trainer and practical exercises performed by the trainee), and evaluation of the operator's performance in the workplace.  (a) The employer failed to ensure that employees which operate the powered industrial vehicles (forklifts) in the facility were provided with training, testing, and an evaluation of their competency prior to allowing them to operated the equipment. This exposed employees to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3150
  • — Z (S) $4500

1910.178 Q07

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Apr 8, 2015
Abate by
Apr 27, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(7): Industrial trucks were not examined before being placed in service:  (a) The employer did not ensure that the powered industrial vehicles (forklifts) were inspected prior to being put into service. This exposed employees to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 8, 2015
Abate by
Apr 27, 2015
Penalty
Initial $4,500 · Current $3,150 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:  (a) The employer did not ensure that the metal cutting die area and straightening rollers on the Tishken Bar Straightening Machine were guarded to prevent employees from accessing the hazard zones while the machine is in operation. This exposed employees to amputation and entanglement hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3150
  • — Z (S) $4500

View Banker Grating, LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340367275.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.