Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: BONIFACIO RUIZ

Unprogrammed Other inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Other safety inspection of BONIFACIO RUIZ in 2393 WEST DUBLIN ROAD, COLUMBUS, OH 43235 (NAICS 238310). OSHA activity number 340373307.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Bonifacio Ruiz — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Bonifacio Ruiz is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
BONIFACIO RUIZ
Site address
2393 WEST DUBLIN ROAD
City
COLUMBUS
State
OH
ZIP
43235
Mailing
3546 ONTARIO STREET, COLUMBUS, OH 43224
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Other (I)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238310
Employees
2
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.154 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 30, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.154(a)(1): Fresh air shall be supplied in sufficient quantities to maintain the health and safety of workmen. Where natural means of fresh air supply is inadequate, mechanical ventilation shall be provided.     a. At building 41 where employees used a kerosene forced air heater to heat the interior of the apartment, the apartment was closed and no means for fresh air was provided, thereby exposing employees to a carbon monoxide exposure Hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.403 B01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 30, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.403(b)(1)(i): Suitability for installation and use in conformity with the provisions of this subpart. Suitability of equipment for an identified purpose may be evidenced by listing, labeling, or certification for that identified purpose.    a. At the worksite where employees used a job made extension cord, a metal enclosure box was used, not in accordance with its listed and labeled use, thereby exposing employees to an electrical contact hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.404 F06

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 30, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.404(f)(6): Grounding path. The path to ground from circuits, equipment, and enclosures shall be permanent and continuous.    a. At the worksite where employees used an extension cord to provide power to a heater, the ground prong was missing from the cord, thereby exposing the employees to an electrical contact hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.405 A02 II I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 30, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.405(a)(2)(ii)(I): Flexible cords and cables shall be protected from damage. Sharp corners and projections shall be avoided. Flexible cords and cables may pass through doorways or other pinch points, if protection is provided to avoid damage.    a. On the second floor of building 41 where employees were using an extension cord to provide power to a heater, the extension cord was ran through the sliding glass door without protection, thereby exposing employees to an electrical contact  hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 30, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502.  Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.    a. At building 41 where employees used 2 inch by 6 inch boards to access one balcony to another, no fall protection measures were used, thereby exposing the employees to an 11 foot 8 inch fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2400

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340373307.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.