STAMFORD, CT ·
OSHA Inspection: GEORGE PALI
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of GEORGE PALI in 1086 LONG RIDGE ROAD, STAMFORD, CT 06903 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 340404037.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- GEORGE PALI
- Site address
- 1086 LONG RIDGE ROAD
- City
- STAMFORD
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06903
- Mailing
- 89 MILL SPRING LANE, STAMFORD, CT 06903
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 7
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.451 B02
- Issued
- Mar 12, 2015
- Abate by
- Mar 18, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,300 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(2): Scaffold platforms and walkways were not at least 18 inches wide: Jobsite: An employee was working from the top rail of the scissor lift scaffold that was 1.5 inches wide.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1300
- · Z (S) $2000
1926.451 G01 VII
- Issued
- Mar 12, 2015
- Abate by
- Mar 18, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section. Jobsite: The employee, who was working from the scissors lift scaffold was exposed to fall hazards and was not provided with any means of fall protection.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Mar 12, 2015
- Abate by
- Mar 18, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,700 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): Jobsite: The employees who were framing and sheathing the roof were not protected from fall hazards by the use guardrails, safety nets or personal fall arrest systems.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1700
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.454 A01
- Issued
- Mar 12, 2015
- Abate by
- Mar 31, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(a)(1): The employer failed to have each employee who performs work while on a scaffold trained regarding the nature of any electrical hazards, fall hazards and falling object hazards in the work area. Jobsite: The employer did not ensure that all employees who were performing work from the scissors lift scaffold were trained by a qualified person in the hazards related to the scaffold and the procedures to control or minimize these hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1000
- · Z (S) $1600
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Mar 12, 2015
- Abate by
- Mar 31, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: Jobsite: The employees, who were exposed fall hazards while working on the flat roof as well on the pitched roofs were not trained in fall hazards and the procedures to be followed to minimize such hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 340404037.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.