Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,124Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-25 Last loaded 2026-08-28

OSHA Inspection: GEORGE PALI

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of GEORGE PALI in 1086 LONG RIDGE ROAD, STAMFORD, CT 06903 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 340404037.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch George Pali for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for George Pali is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
GEORGE PALI
Site address
1086 LONG RIDGE ROAD
City
STAMFORD
State
CT
ZIP
06903
Mailing
89 MILL SPRING LANE, STAMFORD, CT 06903
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
7
Ownership type
Private (A)

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 12, 2015
Abate by
Mar 18, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,300 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(2): Scaffold platforms and walkways were not at least 18 inches wide:       Jobsite: An employee was working from the top rail of the scissor lift scaffold that was 1.5 inches wide.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1300
  • · Z (S) $2000

1926.451 G01 VII

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 12, 2015
Abate by
Mar 18, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section.  Jobsite:  The employee, who was working from the scissors lift scaffold was exposed to fall hazards and was not provided with any means of fall protection.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 12, 2015
Abate by
Mar 18, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,700 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):         Jobsite:  The employees who were framing and sheathing the roof were not protected from fall hazards by the use guardrails, safety nets or personal fall arrest systems.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1700
  • · Z (S) $2800

1926.454 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 12, 2015
Abate by
Mar 31, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.454(a)(1): The employer failed to have each employee who performs work while on a scaffold trained regarding the nature of any electrical hazards, fall hazards and falling object hazards in the work area.    Jobsite: The employer did not ensure that all employees who were performing work from the scissors lift scaffold were trained by a qualified person in the hazards related to the scaffold and the procedures to control or minimize these hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1000
  • · Z (S) $1600

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 12, 2015
Abate by
Mar 31, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  Jobsite: The employees, who were exposed fall hazards while working on the flat roof as well on the  pitched roofs were not trained in fall hazards and the procedures to be followed to minimize such hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 340404037.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.