Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: THE SOUTHWESTERN PLATING COMPANY

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of THE SOUTHWESTERN PLATING COMPANY in 1312 HALPERN STREET, HOUSTON, TX 77009 (NAICS 332813). OSHA activity number 340408137.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch The Southwestern Plating Company — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for The Southwestern Plating Company is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1312 HALPERN STREET
City
HOUSTON
State
TX
ZIP
77009
Mailing
1312 HALPERN STREET, HOUSTON, TX 77009
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332813
Employees
135
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.333 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 13, 2015
Abate by
Mar 25, 2015
Penalty
Initial $6,300 · Current $3,780 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.333(a)(1): Live parts to which an employee was exposed were not deenergized before the employee worked on or near them:    The employer does not ensure that live parts to which an employee is exposed is de-energized before the employee works on or near them.  This violation occurred on or about January 28, 2015, in building 3 adjacent to line #3 where a maintenance employee was exposed to electrical hazards when replacing a breaker in a switchboard without de-energizing the switchboard.         Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that live parts to which an employee is exposed is de-energized before the employee works on or near them.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3780
  • — Z (S) $6300

1910.335 A01 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 13, 2015
Abate by
Mar 25, 2015
Penalty
Initial $6,300 · Current $3,780 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.335(a)(1)(i): Employees working in areas where there were potential electrical hazards were not using electrical protective equipment that was appropriate for the specific parts of the body to be protected and for the work to be performed:      The employer does not ensure that employees working in areas where there are potential electrical hazards are using electrical protective equipment appropriate for the specific parts of the body to be protected.  This violation occurred on or about January 28, 2015, in building 3 adjacent to line #3 where a maintenance employee was exposed to electrical hazards when replacing a breaker in a switchboard without using appropriate protective equipment for hands and torso.         Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that employees working in areas where there is a potential electrical hazard are wearing the appropriate electrical protective equipment for the specific parts of the body to be protected.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3780
  • — Z (S) $6300

1904.39 A02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 13, 2015
Abate by
Mar 19, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,000 · Current $600 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.39(a)(2): The employer did not report the in-patient hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye as a result of a work-related incident to OSHA within twenty-four (24) hours.       The employer does not ensure that the in-patient hospitalization as a result of a work-related incident is reported to OSHA within twenty-four hours. This occurred on or about January 28, 2015 at the facility where a work related in-patient hospitalization of a maintenance employee was not reported to OSHA within 24 hours.      Pursuant to 29 C.F. R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that the in-patient hospitalization as a result of a work-related incident is reported to OSHA within twenty-four hours.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $600
  • — Z (O) $1000

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340408137.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.