Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: TATE ACCESS FLOORS, INC.

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of TATE ACCESS FLOORS, INC. in 52 SPRINGVALE ROAD, RED LION, PA 17356 (NAICS 332322). OSHA activity number 340410117.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Tate Access Floors, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Tate Access Floors, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
52 SPRINGVALE ROAD
City
RED LION
State
PA
ZIP
17356
Mailing
52 SPRINGVALE ROAD, RED LION, PA 17356
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332322
Employees
250
Ownership type
A

1 citation on file for this inspection.

1910.255 B04

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
May 1, 2015
Abate by
Jun 29, 2015
Penalty
Initial $6,300 · Current $4,725 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.255(b)(4): All press welding machine operations, where there was a possibility of the operator's fingers being under the point of operation, were not effectively guarded by use of a device such as an electronic eye safety circuit, two hand controls or protection similar to that prescribed for punch press operation 1910.217 of this part:    (a)  Tate Access Floors Inc. Facility wide - Employees operated Acme Resistance welder # 1, that is operated by two hand trips rather than two hand controls, which did not prevent the operator from getting his/her fingers into the point of operation, on or about February 17, 2015.    (b)  Tate Access Floors Inc. Facility wide - Employees operated Acme Resistance welder # 2, that is operated by two hand trips rather than two hand controls, which did not prevent the operator from getting his/her fingers into the point of operation, on or about February 17, 2015.    (c)  Tate Access Floors Inc. Facility wide - Employees operated Acme Resistance welder # 3, that is operated by two hand trips rather than two hand controls, which did not prevent the operator from getting his/her fingers into the point of operation, on or about February 17, 2015.    (d)  Tate Access Floors Inc. Facility wide - Employees operated Acme Resistance welder # 4, that is operated by two hand trips rather than two hand controls, which did not prevent the operator from getting his/her fingers into the point of operation, on or about February 17, 2015.    (e)  Tate Access Floors Inc. Facility wide - Employees operated Acme Resistance welder # 5, that is operated by two hand trips rather than two hand controls, which did not prevent the operator from getting his/her fingers into the point of operation, on or about February 17, 2015.    (f)  Tate Access Floors Inc. Facility wide - Employees operated Acme Resistance welder # 6, that is operated by two hand trips rather than two hand controls, which did not prevent the operator from getting his/her fingers into the point of operation, on or about February 17, 2015.    (g)  Tate Access Floors Inc. Facility wide - Employees operated Acme Resistance welder # 7, that is operated by two hand trips rather than two hand controls, which did not prevent the operator from getting his/her fingers into the point of operation, on or about February 17, 2015.    (h) Tate Access Floors Inc. Facility wide - Employees operated Acme Resistance welder # 8, that is operated by two hand trips rather than two hand controls, which did not prevent the operator from getting his/her fingers into the point of operation, on or about February 17, 2015.    (i)  Tate Access Floors Inc. Facility wide - Employees operated Acme Resistance welder # 9, that is operated by two hand trips rather than two hand controls, which did not prevent the operator from getting his/her fingers into the point of operation, on or about February 17, 2015.    (j)  Tate Access Floors Inc. Facility wide - Employees operated Acme Resistance welder # 10, that is operated by two hand trips rather than two hand controls, which did not prevent the operator from getting his/her fingers into the point of operation, on or about February 17, 2015.    (k)  Tate Access Floors Inc. Facility wide - Employees operated Acme Resistance welder # 11, that is operated by two hand trips rather than two hand controls, which did not prevent the operator from getting his/her fingers into the point of operation, on or about February 17, 2015.      Abatement certification and documentation required within 10 days after abatement date. The certification shall include a statement that abatement is complete, the date and method of abatement, and state that employees and their representatives were informed of this abatement. Abatement documentation shall include documents demonstrating that abatement is complete, such as evidence of the purchase or repair of equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement or other written records.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4725
  • — Z (S) $6300

View Tate Access Floors, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340410117.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.