Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: THOMAS CONCRETE OF GEORGIA, INC.

Unprogrammed Related inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Related safety inspection of THOMAS CONCRETE OF GEORGIA, INC. in 4650 CANTON ROAD PLANT # 500, MARIETTA, GA 30066 (NAICS 327320). OSHA activity number 340410968.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Thomas Concrete of Georgia, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Thomas Concrete of Georgia, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
4650 CANTON ROAD PLANT # 500
City
MARIETTA
State
GA
ZIP
30066
Mailing
2500 CUMBERLAND PARKWAY SUITE 200, ATLANTA, GA 30339
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Related (G)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
327320
Employees
200
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.146 E03

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 14, 2015
Abate by
Nov 7, 2016
Penalty
Initial $6,300 · Current $2,520 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.146(e)(3): The completed permit was not made available at the time of entry to all authorized entrants, by posting it at the entry portal or by any other equally effective means, so that the entrants could confirm that pre-entry preparations have been completed.    a) 4650 Canton Road, Plant 500, Marietta, GA: The employer did not provide a completed permit to authorized entrants who entered a permit required confined space (silo #2) prior to entry. The entrants were unable to confirm that pre-entry preparations were completed by the host employer.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $2520
  • — C (S) $6300
  • — Z (S) $6300

1910.146 F04

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 14, 2015
Abate by
Nov 7, 2016
Penalty
Initial $6,300 · Current $6,300
29 CFR 1910.146(f)(4): The entry permit that documented compliance and authorized entry to a permit space did not identify the authorized entrants within the permit space by name or by such other means (for example, through the use of rosters or tracking).    a) 4650 Canton Road, Plant 500, Marietta, GA: The employer allowed contracted employees to work in a permit-required confined space (silo #2) where the entry permit, signed by the host employer, did not identify the authorized entrants.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $6300
  • — C (S) $6300
  • — Z (S) $6300

1910.146 F05

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 14, 2015
Abate by
Aug 20, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.146(f)(5): The entry permit that documented compliance and authorized entry to a permit space did not identify the personnel, by name, currently serving as attendants:  a) 4650 Canton Road, Plant 500, Marietta , GA: The employer allowed contracted employees to work in a permit-required confined space (silo #2) where the entry permit, signed by the host employer, did not identify the attendant for the permit space.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.146 F08

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 14, 2015
Abate by
Aug 20, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.146(f)(8): The entry permit that documented compliance and authorized entry to a permit space did not identify the measures used to isolate the permit space and to eliminate or control permit space hazards before entry:   a) 4650 Canton Road, Plant 500, Marietta , GA: The employer did not ensure that the entry permit identified the measures used to isolate or control the permit space (silo #2) prior to entering.  The mechanical gate at the bottom of the hopper was not identified on the entry permit by the employer.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.146 F10

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 14, 2015
Abate by
Aug 20, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.146(f)(10): The entry permit that documented compliance and authorized entry to a permit space did not identify the results of initial and periodic tests performed under 29 CFR 1910.146(d)(5), accompanied by the names or initials of the tester.  a) 4650 Canton Road, Plant 500, Marietta, GA: The employer did not ensure that the entry permit identified the results of initial and periodic atmospheric testing performed, accompanied by the names or initials of the tester.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.146 F12

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 14, 2015
Abate by
Aug 20, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.146(f)(12): The entry permit that documented compliance and authorized entry to a permit space did not identify the communication procedures used by authorized entrants and attendants to maintain contact during the entry:   a) 4650 Canton Road, Plant 500, Marietta , GA: The employer allowed authorized entry into a permit-required confined space (silo #2) and did not identify the communication procedures that would be used by the authorized entrants and attendant to maintain contact during entry. Cell phones were used to maintain contact, which is not an acceptable procedure.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.146 F13

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 14, 2015
Abate by
Aug 20, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.146(f)(13): The entry permit that documented compliance and authorized entry to a permit space did not identify equipment, such as personal protective equipment, testing equipment, communications equipment, alarm systems, and rescue equipment:  a) 4650 Canton Road, Plant 500, Marietta , GA: The employer allowed the contractor employees to work in a permit-required confined space (silo #2) where the entry permit, signed by the host employer, did not identify proper testing and communication equipment. The attendant could not effectively communicate with the authorized entrants while inside the silo to monitor the status or to alert entrants of the need to evacuate the space when a hazard was known or detected.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.146 J02

Deleted Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 14, 2015
Abate by
Aug 20, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.146(j)(2): The employer did not ensure that each entry supervisor verified, by checking that the appropriate entries had been made on the permit, that all tests specified by the permit had been conducted and that all procedures and equipment specified by the permit were in place before endorsing the permit and allowing entry to begin.   a) 4650 Canton Road, Plant 500, Marietta , GA: The employer did not ensure that each entry supervisor verified, by checking that the appropriate entries had been made on the permit, that all procedures and equipment specified by the permit were in place before endorsing the permit and allowing entry.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (O) $0
  • — C (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Thomas Concrete of Georgia, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340410968.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.