MARSEILLES, IL —
OSHA Inspection: INDEPENDENCE TUBE CORP. INC.
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of INDEPENDENCE TUBE CORP. INC. in 1201 BROADWAY ST., MARSEILLES, IL 61341 (NAICS 423510). OSHA activity number 340412428.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- INDEPENDENCE TUBE CORP. INC.
- Site address
- 1201 BROADWAY ST.
- City
- MARSEILLES
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 61341
- Mailing
- 6226 74TH STREET, CHICAGO, IL 60638
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 423510
- Employees
- 102
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.23 E01
- Issued
- Aug 13, 2015
- Abate by
- Feb 21, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $5,000 · Current $3,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.23(e)(1): A standard railing shall consist of top rail, intermediate rail, and posts, and shall have a vertical height of 42 inches nominal from upper surface of top rail to floor, platform, runway, or ramp level. The top rail shall be smooth-surfaced throughout the length of the railing. The intermediate rail shall be approximately halfway between the top rail and the floor, platform, runway, or ramp. The platform railing that would prevent employees from gaining access to the accumulator top railing was at 41 inches and there was no mid-rail. This exposed employees to a fall hazard greater then 4ft into the revolving metal accumulator. Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3000
- — Z (S) $5000
1910.147 C04 II
- Issued
- Aug 13, 2015
- Abate by
- Sep 17, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $5,000 · Current $5,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii): The procedures shall clearly and specifically outline the scope, purpose, authorization, rules, and techniques to be utilized for the control of hazardous energy, and the means to enforce compliance including, but not limited to, the following:
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $5000
- — C (S) $5000
- — Z (S) $5000
1910.147 D
- Issued
- Aug 13, 2015
- Abate by
- Sep 17, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $5,000 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(d): The established procedure for the application of energy control (the lockout or tagout procedures) did not cover the actions listed in and was not done in sequence as required by 29 CFR 1910.147(d)(1)-(6). Prior to starting work on machines, including 5K and 12K Tube Mills, employees assigned to perform setup and other servicing tasks were not required to apply energy controls in the following sequence: (a) turn off and shut down the machines, (b) physically locate and operate energy isolating devices in such a manner as to isolate the machine or equipment from the energy source, (c) affix lockout or tagout devices to each energy isolating device, (d) verify that isolation and deenergization of the machine or equipment have been accomplished. Employees were exposed to caught-in hazards likely to result in amputation of hand(s) and fingers. Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $5000
- — Z (S) $5000
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Aug 13, 2015
- Abate by
- Feb 18, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $5,000 · Current $3,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): Types of guarding. One or more methods of machine guarding shall be provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. Examples of guarding methods are-barrier guards, two-hand tripping devices,electronic safety devices, etc. The employer failed to provide methods of machine guarding that would protect employees while operating the following equipment: a. 5K Tube Mill Machine- The tube mill did not have guarding preventing employees from placing their hands or fingers in the in-running nip points when the tubing is being formed. Employees were exposed to inadvertent contact with moving rolls and associated equipment that could most likely result in amputation. b. 5K Coil Transfer Cart- There were no guards or other prevent measures to prevent employees from being struck by and caught between the cart when it moved. Employees were exposed to struck by and crushing hazards. c. 5K Cutoff Machine & Pullout- The automatic cutoff saw did not have guarding to prevent an employee from entering the work area when the machine was in operation. Employees were exposed to inadvertent struck by hazards. d. 12K Tube Milling Machine- The tube mill did not have guarding preventing employees from placing their hands or fingers in the in-running nip points when the tubing is being formed. Employees were exposed to inadvertent contact with moving rolls and associated equipment that could most likely result in amputation e. 12K Kusakabe Milling Cutoff Machine & Pullout- The automatic saw moves independently from employee interaction, it did not have an effective guarding to prevent employees from gaining access to danger zone when the saw was in operation. Exposing employees to a struck-by hazard. f. 12K Mill Bundle Transfer Conveyor- Employees are required to work inside of the conveyor line with no means of controlling the movement of the product. While employees were banding the tubes, there were no safeguarding devices or guards that would prevent the movement of material from striking/crushing employees while standing in the danger zone. Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3000
- — Z (S) $5000
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 423510)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340412428.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.