SWANSEA, IL —
OSHA Inspection: RICK ANDERSON
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of RICK ANDERSON in 3905 BEECHMONT CR, SWANSEA, IL 62220 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 340413996.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- RICK ANDERSON
- Site address
- 3905 BEECHMONT CR
- City
- SWANSEA
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 62220
- Mailing
- 1141 PISA DRIVE, CASEYVILLE, IL 62232
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
10 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Oct 7, 2015
- Abate by
- Nov 12, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $400 · Current $400
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section. a) For Citation 1, Item 1a, issued on 7/16/2015 with an abatement date of 9/4/2015, the employer did not certify the complete abatement of the cited violation. b) For Citation 1, Item 1b, issued on 7/16/2015 with an abatement date of 9/4/2015, the employer did not certify the complete abatement of the cited violation.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $400
1903.19 D01
- Issued
- Oct 7, 2015
- Abate by
- Nov 12, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $400 · Current $400
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer must submit to the Agency, along with the information on abatement certification required by paragraph (c)(3) of this section, documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required. a) For Citation 1, Item 5, issued on 7/16/2015 with an abatement date of 9/4/2015, the employer did not submit documents demonstrating complete abatement of the cited violation to OSHA. b) For Citation 1, Item 6, issued on 7/16/2015 with an abatement date of 9/4/2015, the employer did not submit documents demonstrating complete abatement of the cited violation to OSHA.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $400
1926.20 B01
- Issued
- Jul 16, 2015
- Abate by
- Sep 4, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain accident prevention programs as necessary to comply with this part: The employer did not initiate and maintain an accident prevention program to establish criteria for protecting employees from fall from heights hazards and struck by hazards.
Recent events (3)
- — A (S) $2000
- — I (S) $1200
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Jul 16, 2015
- Abate by
- Sep 4, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s): The employer did not maintain jobsite inspections that were performed by a person competent to ensure employees were not exposed to the hazards of falling and eye injuries while performing residential roofing operations.
Recent events (3)
- — A (S) $0
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Jul 16, 2015
- Abate by
- Jul 22, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: Head protective equipment was not used when employees were exposed to struck-by hazards while handing material up to works on a higher level.
Recent events (3)
- — A (S) $1600
- — I (S) $960
- — Z (S) $1600
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Jul 16, 2015
- Abate by
- Jul 22, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: Eye protective equipment was not used when employees were exposed to eye injury while using electric circular saws to cut wood material.
Recent events (3)
- — A (S) $1600
- — I (S) $960
- — Z (S) $1600
1926.152 D04
- Issued
- Jul 16, 2015
- Abate by
- Jul 22, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.152(d)(4): At least one portable fire extinguisher having a rating of not less than 20B:C units was not provided on all vehicles used for transporting and/or dispensing flammable or combustible liquids: The employer did not ensure that a portable fire extinguisher was available to employees who were carrying a full 5 gallon gasoline can in the vehicle. The gasoline was being used to fill the generator.
Recent events (3)
- — A (O) $2000
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Jul 16, 2015
- Abate by
- Sep 4, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502: The employer did not ensure fall protection was implemented during residential construction operations when: A: Employees were exposed to the hazard of falling approximately twenty one (21) feet when they were installing roofing sheeting. B. Employees were exposed to the hazard of falling approximately nine and one half (9.5) feet when a basement stairway did not have steps installed in it and was left unguarded. C: Employees were exposed to the hazard of falling when they were working by an unprotected wall hole that was 72 inches wide x 71 inches tall on the second floor of the structure that was approximately fourteen (14) feet from the ground. The inside bottom edge of wall opening had a height of 12 inches above the walking/working surface.
Recent events (3)
- — A (S) $2800
- — I (S) $1680
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Jul 16, 2015
- Abate by
- Sep 4, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: The employer did not provide training to enable employees to properly assess and control the hazards at their worksite while performing residential construction. Employees were exposed to fall hazards associated with an approximately twenty one (21) foot fall.
Recent events (3)
- — A (S) $2800
- — I (S) $1680
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.1052 C01 II
- Issued
- Jul 16, 2015
- Abate by
- Jul 22, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(1)(ii): Stairways having four or more risers or rising more than 30 inches (76 cm), whichever is less, were not equipped with a stairrail system along each unprotected side or edge: A stairway leading from the first to the second floor was not equipped with a stairrail system along the unprotected side. The stairway had 16 risers with platform halfway up. Employees were exposed to the hazard of falling approximately twelve and one half (12.5) feet.
Recent events (3)
- — A (S) $2800
- — I (S) $1680
- — Z (S) $2800
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340413996.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.