BARBERTON, OH —
OSHA Inspection: OHIO PRECISION MOLDING
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of OHIO PRECISION MOLDING in 122 EAST TUSCARAWAS AVE, BARBERTON, OH 44203 (NAICS 323111). OSHA activity number 340420462.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- OHIO PRECISION MOLDING
- Site address
- 122 EAST TUSCARAWAS AVE
- City
- BARBERTON
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 44203
- Mailing
- 122 EAST TUSCARAWAS AVE, BARBERTON, OH 44203
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 323111
- Employees
- 46
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.157 G02
- Issued
- Apr 1, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,100 · Current $1,260 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.157(g)(2): The educational program to familiarize employees with the general principles of fire extinguisher use and the hazards involved with incipient stage fire fighting was not provided to all employees upon initial employment, and at least annually thereafter: On or about February 24, 2015, employees expected to use fire extinguishers in the event of a fire were not trained initially and then annually thereafter.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1260
- — Z (S) $2100
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Apr 1, 2015
- Abate by
- May 6, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $2,940 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks: a) On or about February 16, 2015, the employer failed to ensure that effective guarding was in place to protect employees from the stamping area of the Haas Room hot stamper. The two hand controls did not function properly to prevent employees from coming into contact with the pinch point during operation. b) On or about February 24, 2015, the employer failed to ensure that effective guarding was in place to protect employees from the moving machine parts and stamper of the Kurz hot foil stamping equipment. A trip bar was present on the input side of the equipment, however it did not prevent employees from coming into contact with other hazardous areas including pinch points and rollers. c) On or about February 24, 2015, the employer failed to ensure that effective guarding was in place to protect employees from the pinch point of the closing relay of the screen printing equipment. The equipment is operated by foot pedal, allowing employee hands to come into contact with the closing ram area of the contact relay which initiates the printing action of the equipment.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2940
- — Z (S) $4900
1910.305 G01 IV A
- Issued
- Apr 1, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,785 · Current $1,071 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iv)(A): Flexible cords and/or cables were used as a substitute for the fixed wiring of a structure: On or about February 24, 2015, the employer failed to ensure that flexible cords supplying 110v power to the exterior lighting of the building were not used as a substitute for permanent wiring of the structure.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1071
- — Z (S) $1785
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Apr 1, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,100 · Current $1,260 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: On or about February 24, 2015, the employer did not provide hazard communication training to employees exposed to hazardous chemicals such as, but not limited to, paints, solvents, thinners, and pigments,
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1260
- — Z (S) $2100
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 323111)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340420462.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.