Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: IMPERIAL HAMMER CONTRACTING LLC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of IMPERIAL HAMMER CONTRACTING LLC in 544 DANIEL WEBSTER HIGHWAY, MERRIMACK, NH 03054 (NAICS 561730). OSHA activity number 340424738.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Imperial Hammer Contracting LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Imperial Hammer Contracting LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
544 DANIEL WEBSTER HIGHWAY
City
MERRIMACK
State
NH
ZIP
03054
Mailing
45 AMHERST STREET, NASHUA, NH 03064
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
561730
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.132 A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 27, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(a): Protective equipment was not used when necessary whenever hazards capable of causing injury and impairment were encountered:    (a) Location: roof  On or about 2/25/15, employees were exposed to a 18 foot fall hazard while removing snow on a roof without fall protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.132 D01 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 27, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1)(i): When the employer had assessed the workplace hazard(s) and determined that hazard(s) were present, the employer did not select and/or use the types of personal protective equipment that would protect the affected employee from the hazard(s):    (a) Location: roof  On or about 2/25/15, the employer did not use fall protection to protect employees on a roof 18 feet above a lower level who were engaged in snow removal.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.132 F01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 27, 2015
Abate by
Apr 22, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(f)(1): The employer did not provide training to each employee who is required by this section to use personal protective equipment:    (a) Location: roof      On or about 2/25/15, the employer did not provide training to enable employees to determine when fall protection was necessary.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 27, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which was free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to a fall hazard while using an extension ladder that did not extend three feet above the upper landing.    (a) Location: site  On or about 2/25/15, employees were exposed to a 14 foot fall hazard while accessing a roof from an extension ladder that did not extend three feet above the upper landing.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2800

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340424738.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.