Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MCR INC.

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of MCR INC. in 445 FOREST PARKWAY, FOREST PARK, GA 30297 (NAICS 811121). OSHA activity number 340426162.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch MCR INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for MCR INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
MCR INC.
Site address
445 FOREST PARKWAY
City
FOREST PARK
State
GA
ZIP
30297
Mailing
445 FOREST PARKWAY, FOREST PARK, GA 30297
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
811121
Employees
8
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 23, 2015
Abate by
May 19, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced

Hazardous substances 0440137724602590H130

29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  (a) Spray painting area- The employer had not established a written hazard communication program for employees exposed to hazardous substances such as, but not limited to, paints and hardeners containing isocyanates, xylene, toluene and n-butyl acetate.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.1200 G08

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 23, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 0440137724602590H130

29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8):   The employer did not ensure that Safety Data Sheets were readily accessible during each work shift to employees when they were in their work area(s).  (a) Spray painting area- Safety Data Sheets (SDS) for various paints, hardeners, and reducers were not readily accessible to employees during their work shift. The Safety Data Sheets were maintained on a computer but the owner and painter could not readily locate copies of the requested sheets.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H03 IV

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 23, 2015
Abate by
May 19, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 0440137724602590H130

29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv): The details of the hazard communication training did not include an explanation of the Global Harmonization System (GHS) with respect to the labeling, pictograms, and safety data sheets, including the order of information and how employees could obtain and use the appropriate hazard information:  (a) Painting area- The employer did not provide hazard communication training to employees on the new Global Harmonization System (GHS) that took effect on December 1, 2013. Employees were not familiar with the new standard, safety data sheets, and pictograms.  Employees were exposed to hazardous chemicals, such as but not limited to, paints and hardeners/activators containing isocyanates, xylene, toluene, and n-butyl acetate.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 23, 2015
Abate by
May 19, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 1377H130

29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  (a) Spray painting area- The employer had not established a written respiratory protection program for an employee required to wear a half mask air purifying respirator while spray painting automobile parts.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 23, 2015
Abate by
May 19, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 1377H130

29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  (a) Spray Painting Area- An employee required to wear a tight-fitting face piece respirator while spray painting automobile parts had not received a medical evaluation to determine his ability to safely wear the respirator.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 M02 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 23, 2015
Abate by
May 19, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 1377H130

29 CFR 1910.134(m)(2)(ii): Fit test records were not retained for respirator users until the next fit test was administered:  (a) Spray Painting Area- The employer could not produce a respirator fit test record for an employee required to wear a tight-fitting face piece respirator while spray painting automobile parts.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View MCR INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340426162.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.