BROOKLYN, NY —
OSHA Inspection: FINE ART PRINTING LTD.
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of FINE ART PRINTING LTD. in 303 TEN EYCK STREET, BROOKLYN, NY 11206 (NAICS 323113). OSHA activity number 340433556.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- FINE ART PRINTING LTD.
- Site address
- 303 TEN EYCK STREET
- City
- BROOKLYN
- State
- NY
- ZIP
- 11206
- Mailing
- 303 TEN EYCK STREET, BROOKLYN, NY 11206
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 323113
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.132 D02
- Issued
- May 22, 2015
- Abate by
- Jun 4, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification which included the requirements as outlined in 29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): (a) On or about 3/2/2015 at Fine Art Printing Ltd., the employer had not certified a workplace hazard assessment where employees printed, shot, and washed screens.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
1910.134 C02 II
- Issued
- May 22, 2015
- Abate by
- Jun 4, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(ii): The employer did not establish and implement those elements of a written program necessary to ensure that any employee using a respirator voluntarily was medically able to use that respirator, and that the respirator was cleaned, stored, and maintained so that its use does not present a health hazard to the user: (a) On or about 3/2/2015 at Fine Art Printing Ltd., employees wore half-face respirators during screen printing. The employer had not established a written respiratory protection program.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- May 22, 2015
- Abate by
- Jun 4, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: (a) On or about 3/2/2015 at Fine Art Printing Ltd., employees who wore half-face respirators during screen printing were exposed to respiratory hazards because the employer had not first provided a medical evaluation.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Fine ART Printing LTD.
View Fine ART Printing LTD.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 323113)
More inspections in NY
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340433556.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.