WALPOLE, ME ·
OSHA Inspection: KENNETH FLOWER, INCORPORATED
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of KENNETH FLOWER, INCORPORATED in 21 RIDGE ROAD, WALPOLE, ME 04573 (NAICS 336612). OSHA activity number 340440205.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- KENNETH FLOWER, INCORPORATED
- Site address
- 21 RIDGE ROAD
- City
- WALPOLE
- State
- ME
- ZIP
- 04573
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 4, WALPOLE, ME 04573
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 336612
- Employees
- 8
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.23 C01
- Issued
- Mar 24, 2015
- Abate by
- Mar 30, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.23(c)(1): Open-sided floors and/or platforms four feet or more above adjacent floor or ground level were not guarded with standard railings (or equivalent) and toeboards: a) Upper Shop - Standard railings, including a top rail, mid rail and toeboards, were not provided at all open sides of the wooden walking/working platform which measured 7 feet 10 inches above the floor. b) Upper Shop - Standard railings were not provided on the open sides of the planks leading from the wooden platform to Raines' boat and Shea's boat.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1400
- · Z (S) $2800
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Mar 24, 2015
- Abate by
- Jun 1, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $600 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: Establishment - A written respiratory protection program was not established and implemented when respirators other than dust masks were voluntarily worn.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $600
- · Z (S) $1200
1910.134 D01 III
- Issued
- Mar 24, 2015
- Abate by
- Jun 15, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form: Establishment - The employer did not reasonably estimate workers' exposures to respirator hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Mar 24, 2015
- Abate by
- Jun 1, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: Establishment - The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the workers' ability to use a respirator when respirators other than dust masks were voluntarily worn.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.134 K03
- Issued
- Mar 24, 2015
- Abate by
- Jun 1, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(3): Training was not provided prior to requiring employees to use a respirator in the workplace: Establishment - The employer did not provide respirator training, or at a minimum provide information in Appendix D, to workers who voluntarily use respirators.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.334 A02 II
- Issued
- Mar 24, 2015
- Abate by
- Mar 30, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.334(a)(2)(ii): There was a defect or evidence of damage that could have exposes an employee to injury and the defective or damaged item was not removed from service: a) Upper Shop - A green extension cord spliced into the electrical cord of a DEWALT miter saw was missing the grounding pin. b) Upper Shop - An orange extension cord coiled on the wooden platform was missing the grounding pin.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1000
- · Z (S) $2000
1910.303 B02
- Issued
- Mar 24, 2015
- Abate by
- Mar 30, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(2): Listed or labeled electrical equipment was not used or installed in accordance with instructions included in the listing or labeling: Upper Shop, Wooded Platform - The electrical plug of a DEWALT miter saw was removed and the electrical cord was spliced into a green extension cord.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 336612)
More inspections in ME
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 340440205.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.