Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,201Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-31 Last loaded 2026-09-03

OSHA Inspection: CANTERBURY TAILS PET RESORT & SPA LLC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of CANTERBURY TAILS PET RESORT & SPA LLC in 1964 DONBEA ST., GREEN BAY, WI 54311 (NAICS 812910). OSHA activity number 340443423.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Canterbury Tails PET Resort & SPA LLC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Canterbury Tails PET Resort & SPA LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1964 DONBEA ST.
City
GREEN BAY
State
WI
ZIP
54311
Mailing
1964 DONBEA ST., GREEN BAY, WI 54311
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
812910
Employees
15
Ownership type
Private (A)

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.38 B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
May 27, 2015
Abate by
Jun 24, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,120 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.38(b): An emergency action plan was not in writing, kept in the workplace, and available to employees for review:  a) The employer had not developed a written emergency action plan for facility fires.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1120
  • · Z (S) $1600

1910.95 C01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 10 exposed
Issued
May 27, 2015
Abate by
Jul 16, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1): The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.9(c) through (o) whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 decibels measured on the A scale, or equivalently a dose of fifty percent:  a) On March 6, 2015, an employee was exposed to a noise dose of 62.9% over a 457 minute time period. 62.9% is equivalent to a 8-hour time weighted average of 87 decibels.  b) On March 6, 2015, an employee was exposed to a noise dose of 52.2% over a 319 minute time period. 52.2% is equivalent to a 8-hour time weighted average of 85.3 decibels.  An effective Hearing Conservation Program includes, but is not limited to:     1. Noise level monitoring.     2. Audiometric testing.     3. Wearing of hearing protection.     4. Training program.     5. Record keeping.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1400
  • · Z (S) $2000

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
May 27, 2015
Abate by
Jun 24, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $840 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  a) The employer had not developed a hazard communication program for employees using canine grooming products, kennel cleaning products and other chemical products.  An effective hazard communication program includes, but is not limited to, the following:     1. A written hazard communication program.     2. Ensure the chemical product's container labeling is maintained and secondary containers are properly labeled.      3. Obtaining safety data sheets for the chemical products used by employees and keeping them readily available for employee usage.     4. Ensure employee training includes explanation of the employer's hazard communication program, information on the information included in safety data sheets, the hazards associated with the chemical products, methods the employers has implemented to minimize the employee's exposure to the chemical product, and what actions the employee should take if they are experiencing a reaction to the chemical product.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $840
  • · Z (S) $1200

1910.157 E02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
May 27, 2015
Abate by
Jun 24, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.157(e)(2): Portable fire extinguishers were not visually inspected at least monthly:  a) Portable fire extinguishers throughout the facility were not visually inspected monthly.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 340443423.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.