Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: AXIOM CONTRACTING, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of AXIOM CONTRACTING, INC. in 96 BEAVERDAM LANE, PALM COAST, FL 32137 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 340450568.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Axiom Contracting, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Axiom Contracting, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
96 BEAVERDAM LANE
City
PALM COAST
State
FL
ZIP
32137
Mailing
1025 SUNSHINE LANE, ALTAMONTE SPRINGS, FL 32714
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 27, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $1,260 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:  a. On or about March 5, 2015, employees working on the ground were not protected from employees working overhead, exposing themselves to head injuries.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1260
  • — Z (S) $2100

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 27, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:  a. On or about March 5, 2015, on the roof, employees were using Hitachi pneumatic air guns while installing roofing components and were not wearing safety glasses, exposing them to eye injuries.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1680
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.416 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 27, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $2,100 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.416(a)(1): Employees were permitted to work in proximity to electric power circuits and were not protected against electric shock by de-energizing and grounding the circuits or effectively guarding the circuits by insulation or other means:  a. On or about March 5, 2014, on the 4:12 pitch roof, employees were conducting roofing operations within inches of a 200 ampres drop-down power line, exposing themselves to an electrical hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2100
  • — Z (S) $3500

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 27, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $2,100 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b):  a. On or about March 5, 2015, on the 4:12 pitch roof, an employee was re-roofing operations on the residential house without a fall protection system, exposing them to an 8 feet 3-inch fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2100
  • — Z (S) $3500

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 27, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $1,260 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:  a.  On or about March 5, 2015, the extension ladder used to access the roof did not extend 3 feet above the eave, exposing employees to a 8 feet 3-inch fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1260
  • — Z (S) $2100

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340450568.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.