SAUKVILLE, WI ·
OSHA Inspection: SCHMIT BROS. AUTO, INC.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of SCHMIT BROS. AUTO, INC. in 925 EAST GREEN BAY AVENUE, SAUKVILLE, WI 53080 (NAICS 441110). OSHA activity number 340451665.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SCHMIT BROS. AUTO, INC.
- Site address
- 925 EAST GREEN BAY AVENUE
- City
- SAUKVILLE
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 53080
- Mailing
- 925 EAST GREEN BAY AVENUE, SAUKVILLE, WI 53080
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 441110
- Employees
- 47
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.23 A09
- Issued
- Aug 26, 2015
- Abate by
- Sep 22, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,100 · Current $1,470 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.23(a)(9): Each floor hole, into which persons could not accidentally walk, was not protected by a cover that leaves no openings more than 1 inch wide. (a) The drain grate in the middle of the shop floor had missing portion of grate which created floor holes greater than 1 inch wide that exposed employees to tripping hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1470
- · Z (S) $2100
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Aug 26, 2015
- Abate by
- Sep 22, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,100 · Current $1,470 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), and (h) will be met: (a) The employer did not develop or implement a written hazard communication program to ensure employees have the knowledge and information to work safely with the chemicals they are exposed to while conducting work activities.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1470
- · Z (S) $2100
1910.1200 G01
- Issued
- Aug 26, 2015
- Abate by
- Sep 22, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): The employer did not have a material safety data sheet for each hazardous chemical which they used: (a) The employer did not have safety data sheets for the chemical products that employees use on a daily basis.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Aug 26, 2015
- Abate by
- Sep 22, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: (a) The employer did not provide effective information and training for employees that use chemicals such as but not limited to: windshield wiper fluid and oils.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
More inspections at Schmit Bros. Auto, INC.
View Schmit Bros. Auto, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 441110)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 340451665.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.