Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: FRANCISCO MARIN

Unprogrammed Other inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Other safety inspection of FRANCISCO MARIN in 128 WAVERLY LANE LOT # 129, POOLER, GA 31322 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 340456821.

Watch Francisco Marin — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Francisco Marin is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
FRANCISCO MARIN
Site address
128 WAVERLY LANE LOT # 129
City
POOLER
State
GA
ZIP
31322
Mailing
9902 FERGUSON AVE LOT#101, SAVANNAH, GA 31406
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Other (I)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 24, 2015
Abate by
Apr 17, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $960 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns:    (a) Pooler construction site, on or about, and at times preceding to March 9, 2015, employees working on ground and lower levels who were exposed to being struck-by wooden boards, equipment, and nails were not protected by the use of hard hats.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $960
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 24, 2015
Abate by
Apr 17, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents.    (a) Pooler construction site, on or about, and at times preceding to March 9, 2015, employees utilizing pneumatic nail guns and a circular saw were not wearing eye protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.405 G02 IV

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 24, 2015
Abate by
Apr 17, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $720 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.405(g)(2)(iv): Flexible cords were not connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief is provided to prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints or terminal screws:    (a) Pooler Construction Site, on or about March 9, 2015, flexible extension cord used for powering the Makita circular saw was missing strain relief on the female end.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $720
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.416 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 24, 2015
Abate by
Apr 17, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.416(e)(1): Worn or frayed electric cords or cables were used:  (a) Pooler Construction Site, on or about March 9, 2015, flexible extension cord used for powering the Makita circular saw had damaged sheathing near the female end.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 24, 2015
Abate by
Apr 17, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):     (a) Pooler construction site, on or about, and times preceding to March 9, 2015, employees subject to a 9.8-foot fall hazard while framing a house were not provided with fall protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 24, 2015
Abate by
Apr 17, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $960 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access:    (a)  Pooler Construction site, on or about March 9, 2015, aluminum ladder to gain access to 9.8 foot roof level for framing operations, was extended one foot beyond roof line.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $960
  • — Z (S) $1600

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340456821.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.