OSHA Inspection: ONOFRIO'S FRESH CUT INC.

Issued

2015-06-30 00:00:00

Abate by

2015-08-28 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2800.00 · Current $1500.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment:    ESTABLISHMENT:  The employer did not assess the workplace to determine the necessitate and appropriate types of personal protective equipment (PPE) for employees.

Issued

2015-06-30 00:00:00

Abate by

2015-08-28 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.132(f)(1): The employer did not provide training to each employee who is required by this section to use personal protective equipment:    ESTABLISHMENT:  The employees, required to wear personal protective equipment (PPE) were not trained in the Workplace Hazard Assessment pertaining to the proper use and maintenance of personal protective equipment (PPE).

Issued

2015-06-30 00:00:00

Abate by

2015-07-20 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2800.00 · Current $1500.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.138(b): The employer did not base selection of appropriate hand protection on an evaluation of the performance characteristics of the hand protection relative to the tasks to be performed, conditions present, duration of use, and the hazards and potential hazards identified:    ESTABLISHMENT:  The employees performing battery charging activities were provided with gloves that were not chemically resistant to provide hand protection.

Issued

2015-06-30 00:00:00

Abate by

2015-07-27 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $3500.00 · Current $1800.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not being conducted at least once every three years:    ESTABLISHMENT:  The performance of the employee, operating the Hyster Model N30FR forklift truck was not evaluated at least once every three years.

Issued

2015-06-30 00:00:00

Abate by

2015-07-13 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.178(p)(1): Powered industrial truck(s) found to be in need of repair, defective, or in any way unsafe had not been  taken out of service until restored to safe operating condition(s):  ESTABLISHMENT:  The light of the Hyster Model N30FR forklift truck, was not operable..

Issued

2015-06-30 00:00:00

Abate by

2015-07-13 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2800.00 · Current $1200.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.305(b)(1): Unused openings in boxes, cabinets, or fittings were not effectively closed:    ESTABLISHMENT:  The unused opening on top of the control panel box of the trash compactor was not closed.

Issued

2015-06-30 00:00:00

Abate by

2015-08-28 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2100.00 · Current $1000.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:    ESTABLISHMENT:  The employer had not developed and implemented a written Hazard Communication program where employees were required to handle or work around hazardous chemicals, such as (but not limited to) battery acid and cleaning products.

Issued

2015-06-30 00:00:00

Abate by

2015-08-28 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(h): Employees were not provided effective information and training as specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1) and (2) on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard was introduced in their workplace:    ESTABLISHMENT:  The employer had not provided Hazard Communication training to employees who were required to work with or around hazardous chemicals, such as (but not limited to) battery acid and cleaning products.