Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: NATHAN E. GOFF, DMD

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of NATHAN E. GOFF, DMD in 7 PORTLAND FARMS ROAD, SCARBOROUGH, ME 04074 (NAICS 621210). OSHA activity number 340463413.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Nathan E. Goff, DMD — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Nathan E. Goff, DMD is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
NATHAN E. GOFF, DMD
Site address
7 PORTLAND FARMS ROAD
City
SCARBOROUGH
State
ME
ZIP
04074
Mailing
7 PORTLAND FARMS ROAD, SCARBOROUGH, ME 04074
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
621210
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

1 citation on file for this inspection.

1910.1030 D03 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 22, 2015
Abate by
Apr 30, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,040 · Current $1,020 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1030(d)(3)(ii): Use. The employer did not ensure that the employee used appropriate personal protective equipment unless the employer showed that the employee temporarily and briefly declined to use personal protective equipment when, under rare and extraordinary circumstances, it was the employee's professional judgment that in the specific instance its use would have prevented the delivery of health care or public safety services or would have posed an increased hazard to the safety of the worker or co-worker. When the employee made this judgment, the circumstances were not investigated and documented in order to determine whether changes could be instituted to prevent such occurrences in the future.   Dental office -  The employer did not ensure that the employees used appropriate gloves.  When employees declined to wear the thicker purple gloves that were claimed to be too cumbersome for preparing contaminated instruments for sterilization and other like tasks, the employer did not investigate and document the circumstances in order to determine whether changes could be instituted to prevent such occurrences in the future.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1020
  • — Z (S) $2040

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340463413.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.