Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: SCHENECTADY STEEL CO. INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of SCHENECTADY STEEL CO. INC. in 18 MARIAVILLE RD., SCHENECTADY, NY 12306 (NAICS 332312). OSHA activity number 340469543.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Schenectady Steel CO. INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Schenectady Steel CO. INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
18 MARIAVILLE RD.
City
SCHENECTADY
State
NY
ZIP
12306
Mailing
18 MARIAVILLE RD., SCHENECTADY, NY 12306
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332312
Employees
48
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 14, 2015
Abate by
Apr 24, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,975 · Current $2,330 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:    a) Painting Area - On or about 3/17/2015, an employee who is is required to use a 3-M full face twin cartridge respirator while spray painting has not received a medical evaluation since he began painting approximately 5 months prior to this date.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2330
  • — Z (S) $2975

1910.215 A04

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Apr 14, 2015
Abate by
Apr 22, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,570 · Current $2,330 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4): Work rest(s) on grinding machinery were not adjusted closely to the wheel with a maximum opening of one eighth inch:    a) Parts Bay, Dayton Grinder: On or about 3/17/2015, the work rest clearance exceeded 1/8 inch, exposing employees to amputation and severe laceration hazards.       b) Parts Bay, Large Grinder: On or about 3/17/2015, the work rest clearance exceeded 1/8 inch, exposing employees to amputation and severe laceration hazards.       c) Bay 3 North Shop, Dayton Grinder: On or about 3/17/2015 ,the work rest clearance exceeded 1/8 inch, exposing employees to amputation and severe laceration hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2330
  • — Z (S) $3570

1910.215 B09

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Apr 14, 2015
Abate by
Apr 22, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): The distance between the abrasive wheel periphery and the adjustable tongue or the end of the safety guard peripheral member at the top exceeded one fourth inch:  a) Parts Bay, Dayton Grinder: On or about 3/17/2015, The Dayton pedestal Grinder Model 4Z123C was used while the  tongue guard and the distance to the enclosure opening exceeded the required 1/4 inch distance, exposing employees to struck-by hazards.     b) Parts Bay, Large Grinder: On or about 3/17/2015, The Hisey-Wolf Pedestal Grinder, Serial # 226613 was used while the  tongue guard and the distance to the enclosure opening exceeded the required 1/4 inch distance, exposing employees to struck-by hazards.     c) Bay 3 North Shop, Dayton Grinder: The Dayton pedestal Grinder Model 4Z123G was used while the  tongue guard and the distance to the enclosure opening exceeded the required 1/4 inch distance, exposing employees to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.305 B01 II

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 14, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,529 · Current $2,340 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(1)(ii): Unused openings in boxes, cabinets, or fittings were not effectively closed:    a) Bay 3 of South Shop, Panel HP-1 - The 600V Square D Panel was missing a knockout enclosure on the left lower side of the cabinet, and the inside was missing an entire right side was missing blank fillers or breaker switches exposing employees to electrical hazards.       b)  Bay 3 of South Shop, Panel HP-1-A - The 600V Square D Panel was missing blank fillers or breaker switches exposing employees to electrical hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2340
  • — Z (S) $2529

1910.134 F02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 14, 2015
Abate by
Apr 24, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:  a) Painting Area - On or about 3/17/2015, an employee who is is required to use a 3-M full face twin cartridge respirator while spray painting has not received a fit test since he began painting approximately 5 months prior to this date.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.176 C

Other-than-serious 1 instance 48 exposed
Issued
Apr 14, 2015
Abate by
May 1, 2015
Penalty
Initial $595 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.176(c): Storage areas were not kept free from accumulation of materials that constitute hazards from tripping, fire, explosion, or pest harborage:    a) North and South Shops, On or about 3/17/2015; There are no designated smoking areas or procedures for disposing of smoking materials, some trash barrels were overflowing, saw dust near chop saws had been accumulating, and break areas where food and drink is consumed were not clean and sanitary.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $595

1910.178 Q07

Other-than-serious 3 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Apr 14, 2015
Abate by
Apr 22, 2015
Penalty
Initial $595 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(7): Industrial trucks were not examined before being placed in service:    a) Establishment; On or about 3/17/2015; Pre-use safety inspections were not performed on the powered industrial trucks before use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $595

View Schenectady Steel CO. INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340469543.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.