Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: TAYLORMADE MCD, INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of TAYLORMADE MCD, INC. in 8321 S. ASHLAND AVE., CHICAGO, IL 60620 (NAICS 722513). OSHA activity number 340469618.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Taylormade MCD, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Taylormade MCD, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
8321 S. ASHLAND AVE.
City
CHICAGO
State
IL
ZIP
60620
Mailing
11322 S. HALSTED, CHICAGO, IL 60620
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
722513
Employees
70
Ownership type
Private (A)

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.151 C

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
Sep 9, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $1,470 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where the eyes or body of any person may be exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use:   a) On or about March 13, 2015, at the above located workplace, employees were required to work with corrosive chemicals such as 1) McD All Purpose Super Concentrate, 2) Kay Chemical Company's Freeze/Cooler Cleaner and 3) Kay Chemical Company's Remove Oven Cleaner that contained sodium hydroxide. An eyewash was present but not functional. Employees were thereby exposed to the hazards associated with chemical contact.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1470
  • · Z (S) $2100

1910.303 G02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Sep 9, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $2,450 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(2)(i):  Live parts of electric equipment operating at 50 volts or more were not guarded against accidental contact by approved cabinets or other forms of approved enclosures, or other means listed under this provision:    a) On or about March 13, 2015, at the above located workplace, in the northwest corner of the lobby energized 120 volt wiring was exposed. The wiring was not enclosed in an approved box or other approved enclosure. Employees required to wash and mop the lobby were thereby exposed to the hazards associated with electrical contact.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2450
  • · Z (S) $3500

1910.305 G02 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 14 exposed
Issued
Sep 9, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(2)(iii): Flexible cords and cables were not connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief was provided that would prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints or terminal screws:   a) On or about March 13, 2015, at the above located workplace, employees worked with and around a 240 volt toaster. The toaster had a 240 volt cord and plug power supply which did not have properly installed strain relief. The condition of the cord was not in accordance with instructions included in the listing or labeling. Employees required to work with the toaster were thereby exposed to hazards associated with improperly wired electrical equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.334 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Sep 9, 2015
Abate by
Oct 5, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,960 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.334(b)(2): After a circuit was deenergized by a circuit protective device, the repetitive manual reclosing of circuit breakers was allowed:     a) On or about April 7, 2015, at the above located work place, employees working with and around the fryer were required to repeatedly reclose/reset the fryer's circuit breaker. The employees were thereby exposed to fire and electrical hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1960
  • · Z (S) $2800

1910.37 B05

Other-than-serious 1 instance 40 exposed
Issued
Sep 9, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(5): Each doorway or passage along an exit access that could be mistaken for an exit was not marked "Not an Exit" or similar designation, or be identified by a sign indicating its actual use (e.g., closet):  a) On or about March 13, 2015, at the above located workplace, employees were required to work in the basement. At the top of the basement stairs there was a door with an exit sign. The door was locked at all times and was not an exit.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 340469618.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.