BIRMINGHAM, AL ·
OSHA Inspection: TEXAS DE BRAZIL (BIRMINGHAM) CORPORATION
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of TEXAS DE BRAZIL (BIRMINGHAM) CORPORATION in 2301 RICHARD ARRINGTON JR. BLVD. NORTH STE 100, BIRMINGHAM, AL 35203 (NAICS 722110). OSHA activity number 340473396.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- TEXAS DE BRAZIL (BIRMINGHAM) CORPORATION
- Site address
- 2301 RICHARD ARRINGTON JR. BLVD. NORTH STE 100
- City
- BIRMINGHAM
- State
- AL
- ZIP
- 35203
- Mailing
- 2952 N. STEMMONS FWY, DALLAS, TX 75247
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 722110
- Employees
- 46
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.37 A03
- Issued
- Jun 17, 2015
- Abate by
- Jun 29, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,380 · Current $1,428 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.37(a)(3): Exit route(s) were not kept free and unobstructed: a) On or about 03/18/2015 - Restaurant, the exit route leading from the kitchen to the rear exit was obstructed with restaurant supplies.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1428
- · Z (S) $2380
1910.176 B
- Issued
- Jun 17, 2015
- Abate by
- Jun 29, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.176(b): Material stored in tiers was not stacked, blocked, interlocked or limited in height so that it was stable and secure against sliding and collapse: a) On or about 03/18/2015 - Rear exit route, boxes of restaurant supplies were not stacked appropriately to ensure stability and prevent them from sliding and collapse.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.133 A01
- Issued
- Jun 17, 2015
- Abate by
- Jun 29, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,380 · Current $1,428 Reduced
2260
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): Protective eye equipment was not required where there was a reasonable probability of injury that could be prevented by such equipment: a) On or about 03/18/2015 - Meat roasting area, employees using corrosive cleaners such as, but not limited to, Greasestrip Plus, to clean charcoal-fueled commercial grills were not required to wear protective eye equipment.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1428
- · Z (S) $2380
1910.138 B
- Issued
- Jun 17, 2015
- Abate by
- Jun 29, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
2260
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.138(b): The employer did not base selection of appropriate hand protection on an evaluation of the performance characteristics of the hand protection relative to the tasks to be performed, conditions present, duration of use, and the hazards and potential hazards identified: a) On or about0 3/18/2015 - Meat roasting area, employees using corrosive cleaners such as, but not limited to, Greasestrip Plus, to clean charcoal-fueled commercial grills were not provided hand protection appropriate to the task.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.151 C
- Issued
- Jun 17, 2015
- Abate by
- Aug 25, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
2260
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use: a) On or about 03/18/2015 - Meat roasting area, employees using corrosive cleaners such as, but not limited to Greasestrip Plus, to clean charcoal-fueled commercial grills were not provided suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Jun 17, 2015
- Abate by
- Jul 14, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: a) On or about 03/18/25 - Restaurant, employees working with hazardous chemicals such as, but not limited to, Greasestrip Plus, were not provided with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 722110)
More inspections in AL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 340473396.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.