GLASTONBURY, CT —
OSHA Inspection: MOYLAN PROPERTY SERVICES
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of MOYLAN PROPERTY SERVICES in 325 CLARK HILL ROAD, GLASTONBURY, CT 06033 (NAICS 561730). OSHA activity number 340473420.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MOYLAN PROPERTY SERVICES
- Site address
- 325 CLARK HILL ROAD
- City
- GLASTONBURY
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06033
- Mailing
- 19 COLTON ROAD, SOMERS, CT 06071
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 561730
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.266 H02 V
- Issued
- Apr 8, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.266(h)(2)(v): An undercut was not made in each tree being felled: On or about 01/23/2015 employees at the Glastonbury land clearing project were exposed to crushing hazards from falling trees. Employees were engaged in tree cutting without making undercuts.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $1400
- — C (S) $2800
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.266 I01
- Issued
- Apr 8, 2015
- Abate by
- Jul 10, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.266(i)(1): The employer did not provide training for each employee, including supervisors, at no cost to the employee: On or about 01/23/2015 employees at the Glastonbury land clearing project were not trained in logging operations. Employer did not provide training on proper tree cutting techniques, safe use and operations of chain saws and the recognition of safety and health hazards associated with the employee's work environment and tasks.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $1400
- — C (S) $2800
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.266 D01 IV
- Issued
- Apr 8, 2015
- Abate by
- Jul 10, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.266(d)(1)(iv): The employer did not provide, at no cost to the employee, and/or assure that each employee who operated a chain saw wore ballistic nylon leg protection or other leg protection which the employer had demonstrated provides equivalent protection: On or about 01/23/2015 employees at the Glastonbury land clearing project were not provided leg protection while operating a chain saw during logging operations.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $1400
- — C (S) $2800
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.266 D01 VI
- Issued
- Apr 8, 2015
- Abate by
- Jul 10, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.266(d)(1)(vi): The employer did not provide, at no cost to the employee, and/or assure that each employee who worked in an area where there was potential for head injury from falling or flying objects wore head protection meeting the requirements of subpart I of Part 1910: On or about 01/23/2015 employees at the Glastonbury land clearing project were not provided head protection during tree cutting operations.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.266 D01 VII B
- Issued
- Apr 8, 2015
- Abate by
- Jul 10, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.266(d)(1)(vii)(B): The employer did not provide, at no cost to the employee, and ensure that each employee wear face protection meeting the requirements of subpart I of Part 1910 where there was potential for facial injury such as, but not limited to, operating a chipper. Logger-type mesh screens may be worn by employees performing chain-saw operations and yarding: On or about 01/23/2015 employees at the Glastonbury land clearing project were not provided face protection while operating chain saws during logging operations.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 561730)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340473420.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.