Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: SSAS DEVELOPMENT, LLC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of SSAS DEVELOPMENT, LLC in 498 LOWELL STREET, LEXINGTON, MA 02420 (NAICS 236115). OSHA activity number 340473966.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Ssas Development, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Ssas Development, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
498 LOWELL STREET
City
LEXINGTON
State
MA
ZIP
02420
Mailing
P.O. BOX 244, LEXINGTON, MA 02420
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236115
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 B01

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 14, 2015
Abate by
May 17, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii):    (a) Location 498 Lowell Street, Lexington, MA:    On or about 3/16/2015, carpenter bracket scaffolds were not fully planked.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 14, 2015
Abate by
May 17, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, sturcure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used.  Crossbraces were used as a means of access:  (a) Location 498 Lowell Street, Lexington, MA:  On or about 3/16/2015, safe means of access was not provided for carpenter bracket scaffolds.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 14, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m)  or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502:    (a) Location 498 Lowell Street, Lexington, MA:    On or about 3/16/2015, employees working in proximity to wall openings were not protected from falling.    (b) Location 498 Lowell Street, Lexington, MA:    On or about 3/16/2015, employees working in proximity to floor openings were not protected from falling.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.502 D06 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 14, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(6)(i): A snaphook not of the locking type was engaged (i) directly to webbing, rope or wire rope; (ii) to each other (iii) to a Dee-ring to which another snaphook or other connector is attached;(iv) to a horizontal lifeline; or (v) to any object which is incompatibly shaped or dimensioned in relation to the snaphook such that unintentional disengagement could occur by the connected object being able to depress the snaphook keeper and release itself:    (a) Location 498 Lowell Street, Lexington, MA:    On or about 3/16/2015, the vertical lifeline of a personal fall arrest system was wrapped around framing members and attached directly its own rope.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.502 D15

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 14, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(15): Anchorage used for attachment for personal fall arrest equipment was not capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds (22.2 kN) per employee attached nor was it designed, installed and used as follows: As part of a complete personal fall arrest system which maintains a safety factor of at least two; and under the supervision of a qualified person:  (a) Location 498 Lowell Street, Lexington, MA:  On or about 3/16/2015, the anchorage point for a personal fall arrest system was established by wrapping the lifeline around two wooden framing members of an interior wall.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.502 D16 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 14, 2015
Abate by
May 17, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(16)(iii): Personal fall arrest systems, when stopping a fall, were not rigged such that an employee could not free fall more than 6 feet (1.8 m) nor contact any lower level:  (a) Location 498 Lowell Street, Lexington, MA:  On or about 3/16/2015, a personal fall arrest system was in use that would not have prevented contact with the ground.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.502 I04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 14, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.502(i)(4): All covers were not color coded or marked with the word "HOLE" or "COVER" to provide warning of the hazard:  (a) Location 498 Lowell Street, Lexington, MA:  On or about 3/16/2015, a floor opening cover was not marked.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B04

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 14, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $600 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): Ladder(s) were used for purposes other than the purpose for which they were designed:    (a) Location 498 Lowell Street, Lexington, MA:    On or about 3/16/2015, a self supporting ladder was used in the closed position.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $600
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.416 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 14, 2015
Penalty
Initial $400 · Current $300 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.416(e)(1): Worn or frayed electric cords or cables were used:    (a) Location 498 Lowell Street, Lexington, MA:    On or about 3/16/2015, the outer jacket of the power cord of a Hitachi circular saw was worn.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $300
  • — Z (O) $400

View Ssas Development, LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340473966.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.