MIDLAND, TX —
OSHA Inspection: ELIGIO RUIZ CONSTRUTION
Unprogrammed Other inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Other safety inspection of ELIGIO RUIZ CONSTRUTION in 6111 COPPER SKY COURT, MIDLAND, TX 79712 (NAICS 236115). OSHA activity number 340475870.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ELIGIO RUIZ CONSTRUTION
- Site address
- 6111 COPPER SKY COURT
- City
- MIDLAND
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 79712
- Mailing
- 5335 N. GRANDVIEW AVE #1306, ODESSA, TX 79762
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Unprogrammed Other (I)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 236115
- Employees
- 11
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Jul 7, 2015
- Abate by
- Jul 25, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: On or about 18 March 2015 employees of Arenas Roofing were exposed to head injury from falling or flying objects when the employer failed to ensure that employees working below employees on the roof of the structure were wearing hardhats or had another type of overhead cover.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $800
- — Z (S) $1600
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Jul 7, 2015
- Abate by
- Jul 25, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees shall be provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations present potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents. On or about 18 March 2015 employees were exposed to eye injuries or hazards when the employer failed to ensure that employees working with saws and pneumatic nail guns had eye protection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.405 A02 II I
- Issued
- Jul 7, 2015
- Abate by
- Jul 25, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.405(a)(2)(ii)(I): Flexible cords and cables shall be protected from damage. Sharp corners and projections shall be avoided. Flexible cords and cables may pass through doorways or other pinch points, if protection is provided to avoid damage. On or about 18 March 2015 employees were exposed to electrical shock hazards when the employer failed to ensure that flexible cords used at the jobsite were properly maintained and were rated as hard or extra hard usage.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $800
- — Z (S) $1600
1926.405 A02 II J
- Issued
- Jul 7, 2015
- Abate by
- Jul 25, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.405(a)(2)(ii)(J): Extension cord sets used with portable electric tools and appliances were not designed for hard or extra-hard usage: On or about 18 March 2015 employees were exposed to electrical shock hazards when the employer failed to ensure that flexible cords used at the jobsite were properly maintained and were rated as hard or extra hard usage.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.405 G02 IV
- Issued
- Jul 7, 2015
- Abate by
- Jul 25, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.405(g)(2)(iv): Flexible cords were not connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief is provided to prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints or terminal screws: On or about 18 March 2015 employees were exposed to electrical shock hazards when the employer failed to ensure that flexible cords used at the jobsite were properly maintained, had adequate strain relief and were rated as hard or extra hard usage.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.501 B11
- Issued
- Jul 7, 2015
- Abate by
- Jul 25, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11): Each employee on a steep roof with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected from falling by guardrail systems with toeboards, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems: On or about 18 March 2015 The employer failed to ensure that employees working on a steep roof had fall protection when working more than six feet above the next lowest level, exposing employees to fall hazards
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1200
- — Z (S) $2400
1926.1053 B04
- Issued
- Jul 7, 2015
- Abate by
- Jul 25, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): Ladder(s) were used for purposes other than the purpose for which they were designed: On or about 18 March 2015 employees were exposed to fall hazards when the employer failed to ensure that a step ladder used at the jobsite was opened with the locks engaged and properly deployed.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $800
- — Z (S) $1600
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 236115)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340475870.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.