Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: AFFILIATED WAREHOUSE INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of AFFILIATED WAREHOUSE INC. in 353 HOWARD STREET, BROCKTON, MA 02302 (NAICS 493110). OSHA activity number 340477991.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Affiliated Warehouse INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Affiliated Warehouse INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
353 HOWARD STREET
City
BROCKTON
State
MA
ZIP
02302
Mailing
353 HOWARD STREET, BROCKTON, MA 02302
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
493110
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.132 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
May 19, 2015
Abate by
Jun 17, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(a): Protective equipment was not used when necessary whenever hazards capable of causing injury and impairment were encountered:    Storage Warehouse: Where employees handle storage containers of caustic and corrosive chemicals such as: Flourosilic Acid, Caustic Soda Micro Pearls, Hydrogen peroxide and Disodium Metasilicate Anhydrous, the employer did not provide personal protective equipment such as but not limited to appropriate chemical resistant gloves to wear in case of container leaks or spills.  An employee wearing work gloves received a chemical burn on his hand when liquid from a storage container of hydrogen peroxide leaked onto his hand and went through the glove to his skin.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $400
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.138 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
May 19, 2015
Abate by
Jun 17, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.138(a): The employer did not select and require employee(s) to use appropriate hand protection when employees' hands were exposed to hazards such as those from skin absorption of harmful substances; severe cuts or lacerations; severe abrasion; punctures; chemical burns; thermal burns; and harmful temperature extremes:  Storage Warehouse: Where employees handle storage containers of caustic and corrosive chemicals such as: Flourosilic Acid, Caustic Soda Micro Pearls, Hydrogen peroxide and Disodium Metasilicate Anhydrous, the employer did not provide chemical resistant gloves to wear in case of container leaks or spills.  An employee wearing work gloves received a chemical burn on his hand when a storage container of hydrogen peroxide leaked onto his hand.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 L02 II

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 19, 2015
Abate by
Jun 17, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(2)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training consisting of a combination of formal instruction (e.g., lecture, discussion, interactive computer learning, video tape, written material), practical training (demonstrations performed by the trainer and practical exercises performed by the trainee), and evaluation of the operator's performance in the workplace.    Storage Warehouse: Operators were not trained and evaluated prior to using forklifts.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $400
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.1200 H03 III

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
May 19, 2015
Abate by
Jun 17, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iii): Employee training did not include the measures employees can take to protect themselves from chemical hazards, including specific procedures the employer had implemented to protect employees from exposure to hazardous chemicals, such as appropriate work practices, emergency procedures and personal protective equipment to be used:    Storage Warehouse: Where employees handle storage containers of caustic and corrosive chemicals such as: Flourosilic Acid, Caustic Soda Micro Pearls, Hydrogen peroxide and Disodium Metasilicate Anhydrous, the employer had not informed employees of emergency procedures to follow and personal protective equipment to wear in case of container leaks or spills.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $400
  • — Z (S) $1200

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340477991.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.