Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: T. FULLER CONSTRUCTION, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of T. FULLER CONSTRUCTION, INC. in 622 N MARKET STREET, WATERLOO, IL 62298 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 340480490.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch T. Fuller Construction, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for T. Fuller Construction, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
622 N MARKET STREET
City
WATERLOO
State
IL
ZIP
62298
Mailing
1305 ILLINOIS STATE ROUTE 3, WATERLOO, IL 62298
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.404 B01 II

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
May 13, 2015
Abate by
Jun 9, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $913 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.404(b)(1)(ii): On a construction site, where an assured equipment grounding program was not utilized, all 120-volt, single-phase, 15 and 20 ampere receptacle outlets which were not a part of the permanent wiring of the building or structure and which are in use by employees did not have approved ground fault circuit interrupers for personal protection:    The employer did not have an assured equipment grounding program or a ground fault circuit interrupter for 120-volt, single-phase, 15 and 20 ampere receptacle outlets which were not a part of the permanent wiring of the building.  A red two wire extension cord was used to charge batteries on the roof exposing employees to electrical hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $913
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.405 A02 II J

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
May 13, 2015
Abate by
May 19, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $913 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.405(a)(2)(ii)(J): Extension cord sets used with portable electric tools and appliances were not of the three-wire type:       The company used a two wire red extension cord to provide service to a battery charging station which was located on the roof of the building, and employees were exposed to possible electrical burns due to a lack of a ground cord.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $913
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.501 B10

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
May 13, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,522 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10): Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet or more above lower levels, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and guardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safety monitoring system.  Or, on roofs 50-feet (15.25 m) or less in width, each employee was not protected by use of a monitoring system:      The employer did not have each employee engaged in roofing activities on an approximately 120 foot long by 49 foot wide and 12 foot high low slop roof protected by the use of monitoring system, a warning line system, a guardrail system, a safety net system,  a personal fall arrest system, or any combinations of systems.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1522
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.503 A02 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
May 13, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(2)(iii): The employer did not assure that each employee has been trained, as necessary, by a competent person in the use and operation of guardrail systems, safety net systems, warning line systems, safety monitoring systems, controlled access zones, and other protection to be used:  The employer did not assure that each employee has been trained by a competent person in the use and operation of a safety monitoring system regarding work conducted on a low slope roof which was approximately 12 feet from a lower level.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
May 13, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,522 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:      The employer did not have a Louisville Extension Ladder, Model #L-2222-24, at least 3 feet above the upper landing surface where employees were exposed to falls of approximately 12 feet to a lower level.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1522
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.1053 B16

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
May 13, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,130 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(16): Portable ladders with structural defects, such as, but not limited to, broken or missing rungs, cleats, or steps, broken or split rails, corroded components, or other faulty or defective components, were not either immediately marked in a manner that readily identifies them as defective, or tagged with "Do Not Use" or similar language, and were not withdrawn from service until repaired.      The employer did not have a Louisville Extension Ladder, Model #L-2222-24 with damaged leg supports marked or tagged with "Do Not Use", and withdrawn from service until it was repaired.   The employee used the ladder to access/egress to and from a 12 foot high roof.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2130
  • — Z (S) $2800

View T. Fuller Construction, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340480490.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.