Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: WESTSIDE COLLISION CENTER OF PENSACOLA, INC.

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of WESTSIDE COLLISION CENTER OF PENSACOLA, INC. in 7607 FLOWERS STREET, PENSACOLA, FL 32506 (NAICS 811121). OSHA activity number 340495076.

Watch Westside Collision Center OF Pensacola, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Westside Collision Center OF Pensacola, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
7607 FLOWERS STREET
City
PENSACOLA
State
FL
ZIP
32506
Mailing
7607 FLOWERS STREET, PENSACOLA, FL 32506
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
811121
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 13, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  a.  On or about March 25, 2015, spray painter and Line X tech were required to wear respirators and the employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program that addressed the worksite-specific procedures such as but not limited to employee medical evaluations, fit testing, and training on the use, maintenance and care of the respirator.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 13, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  a.  On or about March 25, 2015, employees who were required to wear a NIOSH approved half-face and full-face respirators had not been provided with medical evaluations prior to wearing the respirators.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 F01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 13, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):  a.  On or about March 25, 2015, employees who were required to wear NIOSH approved 3M half-face respirator and Allegro full-face respirator had not been fit tested prior to initial use of the respirators.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 K03

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 13, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(3): Training was not provided prior to requiring employees to use a respirator in the workplace:  a.  On or about March 25, 2015, employees who were required to wear NIOSH approved 3M half-face respirator and Allegro full-face respirator had not received respirator training.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 13, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  a.  On or about March 25, 2015, the employer did not develop and implement the written hazard communication program which described how requirements of 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) would be met for employees who have exposure to hazardous materials such as but not limited to Methylene Bisphenyl Isocyanate and Polyhexamethylene Diisocyanate.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H03 IV

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 13, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv):   The details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer, did not include an explanation of the labels received on shipped containers and the workplace labeling system used by their employer; the safety data sheet, including the order of information and how employee could obtain and use the appropriate hazard information:  a.  On or about March 25, 2015, the employer did not include in the hazard communication program an explanation of the labeling system, safety data sheet, and training to employees who have exposure to hazardous materials such as but not limited to Methylene Bisphenyl Isocyanate and Polyhexamethylene Diisocyanate.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340495076.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.