LA MESA, TX ·
OSHA Inspection: NOLAN H. COPE, INC.
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of NOLAN H. COPE, INC. in 1610 SOUTH DALLAS AVE, LA MESA, TX 79331 (NAICS 327320). OSHA activity number 340495886.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- NOLAN H. COPE, INC.
- Site address
- 1610 SOUTH DALLAS AVE
- City
- LA MESA
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 79331
- Mailing
- 1610 SOUTH DALLAS AVE, LA MESA, TX 79331
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 327320
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
13 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.22 A01
- Issued
- Sep 18, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 23, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $608 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.22(a)(1): Employer did not ensure that all places of employment, passageways, walking/working surfaces were kept clean and orderly: On or about April 8, 2015, employees were exposed to fall hazards while climbing extension ladder to fly ash silo ladder accessing silo.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $608
- · Z (S) $1200
1910.22 A03
- Issued
- Sep 18, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 15, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.22(a)(3): To facilitate cleaning, every floor, working place, and passageway shall be kept free from holes, and/or loose/broken/missing boards: On or about April 8, 2015, employees were exposed fall hazards while working on platform around the hopper with holes in the floor, and visible gaps between boards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.23 C01
- Issued
- Sep 18, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 23, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $608 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.23(c)(1): Open-sided floors and/or platforms four (4) feet or more above adjacent floor or ground level were not guarded with standard railings (or equivalent) and toe boards: On or about April 8, 2015, the employer did not ensure that fall protection was provided for employees when they were in excess of four (4) feet exposing employees to fall hazards in the following instances: 1. Platform on top of fly ash silo. 2. Platform around hopper. 3. Stairs leading to working platform underneath hopper.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $608
- · Z (S) $1600
1910.26 C03 III
- Issued
- Sep 18, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 23, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $608 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.26(c)(3)(iii): Employer did not ensure the extension ladder base section was placed with a secure footing: On or about April 8, 2015, the employees were exposed to fall hazards when using extension ladder to access ladder on fly ash silo and it was not placed on smooth even ground.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $608
- · Z (S) $1600
1910.26 C03 IV
- Issued
- Sep 18, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 15, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.26(c)(3)(iv): Top of the ladder was not placed with the two rails supported, and/or equipped with a single support attachment: On or about April 8, 2015, the employees were exposed to fall hazards when the extension ladder used to access the ladder to the fly ash silo was not supported to keep it from falling.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.132 F01
- Issued
- Sep 18, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 23, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $560 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(f)(1): Employer did not ensure training was provided to each employee who is required by this section to use PPE: On or about April 8, 2015, employees that were required to wear Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) during the performance of their job duties were not provided training in knowledge and understanding of importance of wearing their fall protection in their performance of their daily work.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $560
- · Z (S) $2800
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Sep 18, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 23, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $480 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): In the workplace where respirators are necessary and required by employer, the employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program with worksite-specific procedures. The program was not updated as necessary to reflect those changes in workplace conditions that affect respirator use: On or about April 8, 2015, employees were exposed to respiratory hazards when working in and around silica and fly ash dust in the workplace.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $480
- · Z (S) $2400
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Sep 18, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 23, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $608 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator. On or about April 8, 2015, the employer failed to ensure that all employees who were required to use a respirator were required to pass a fit test of any type prior to using a tight fitting respirator exposing employees to silica dust hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $608
- · Z (S) $1600
1910.303 B07 I
- Issued
- Sep 18, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 23, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $608 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(7)(i): Unused openings in boxes, raceways, auxiliary gutters, cabinets, equipment cases, or housings were not effectively closed to afford protection substantially equivalent to the control panel: On or about April 8, 2015, the employer did not ensure the cabinet panel cover to the electrical controls in batch room was effectively closed exposing employees to electrical hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $608
- · Z (S) $1200
1910.305 A02 I A
- Issued
- Sep 18, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 23, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $608 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(a)(2)(i)(A): Employer did not ensure that during remodeling, maintenance, or repair of buildings, structures, or equipment, and similar activities: On April 8, 2015, the employer had installed make shift lighting in the batch house, exposing employees to burn hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $608
- · Z (S) $1200
1910.305 A02 IX
- Issued
- Sep 18, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 23, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $608 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(a)(2)(ix): Employer did not ensure that lamp(s) for general illumination were not protected from accidental contact or breakage by a suitable fixture or lamp holder with a guard: On or about April 8, 2015, the employer did not ensure that an fluorescent light located in the batch room had proper cover installed.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $608
- · Z (S) $1200
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Sep 18, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 23, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $608 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the facility, a written hazard communication program which described how criteria in 29 CFR 1910.1200 (f), (g), and (H) will be met: On or about April 8, 2015, the employer did not develop a written hazardous communication program. Employees were exposed to the hazards associated with silica when working with concrete and fly ash.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $608
- · Z (S) $1600
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Sep 18, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 15, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazards associated with working with silica: On or about April 8, 2015, the employer did not ensure that employees had received training in the hazards of working with silica at the facility exposing employees to respiratory hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 327320)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 340495886.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.