DENVER, CO —
OSHA Inspection: MCDONALD'S RESTAURANTS OF COLORADO, INC.
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of MCDONALD'S RESTAURANTS OF COLORADO, INC. in 1905 S FEDERAL BLVD, DENVER, CO 80219 (NAICS 722513). OSHA activity number 340500255.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MCDONALD'S RESTAURANTS OF COLORADO, INC.
- Site address
- 1905 S FEDERAL BLVD
- City
- DENVER
- State
- CO
- ZIP
- 80219
- Mailing
- 1905 S FEDERAL BLVD, DENVER, CO 80219
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 722513
- Employees
- 40
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.132 A
- Issued
- Jul 16, 2015
- Abate by
- Aug 5, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $3,400 · Current $3,400
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(a): Protective equipment was not used when necessary whenever hazards capable of causing injury and impairment were encountered: (a) McDonalds Restaurants of Colorado, Inc., at 1905 S Federal Boulevard, Denver, CO: On 3/19/15 McDonald's Corporation did not ensure that protective equipment was used when necessary whenever hazards capable of causing injury and impairment were encountered. One employee filtered approximately 250 degree Fahrenheit oil while cleaning the fryer. The employee was not using a heat resistant apron while filtering the oil. This condition exposed the employee to a burn hazard.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $3400
- — C (S) $3400
- — Z (S) $3400
1910.133 A01
- Issued
- Jul 16, 2015
- Abate by
- Aug 5, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee use appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation: (a) McDonald's Restaurants of Colorado, Inc., at 1905 S Federal Boulevard, Denver, CO: On 3/19/15 McDonald's Corporation did not ensure that each affected employee use appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from liquid chemicals. One employee filtered approximately 250 degree Fahrenheit oil while cleaning the fryer. The employee was not using eye or face protection while filtering the oil. This condition exposed the employee to a burn hazard. (b) McDonald's Restaurants of Colorado, Inc., at 1905 S Federal Boulevard, Denver, CO: On and preceding 3/19/15 McDonald's Corporation did not ensure that each affected employee use appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from acids or caustic liquids. Employees filled mop buckets with Kay Chemical Company SolidSense FloorCare A (containing 20-50% citric acid). The corrosive liquid at dilution concentration has a pH of 4.5. Employees did not use eye or face protection while filling the mop bucket. This condition exposed the employees to a chemical hazard.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.138 A
- Issued
- Jul 16, 2015
- Abate by
- Aug 5, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.138(a): The employer did not select and require employee(s) to use appropriate hand protection when employees' hands were exposed to hazards such as those from skin absorption of harmful substances; severe cuts or lacerations; severe abrasions; punctures; chemical burns; thermal burns; and harmful temperature extremes: (a) McDonald's Restaurants of Colorado, Inc., at 1905 S Federal Boulevard, Denver, CO: On 3/19/15 McDonald's Restaurants of Colorado, Inc. did not select and require employee(s) to use appropriate hand protection when employees' hands were exposed to hazards such as those from thermal burns. One employee filtered approximately 250 degree Fahrenheit oil while cleaning the fryer. The employee was not using heat resistant gloves while filtering the oil. This condition exposed the employee to a burn hazard. (b) McDonald's Restaurants of Colorado, Inc., at 1905 S Federal Boulevard, Denver, CO: On and preceding 3/19/15 McDonald's Restaurants of Colorado, Inc. did not select and require employee(s) to use appropriate hand protection when employees' hands were exposed to hazards such as those from chemical burns. Employees filled mop buckets with Kay Chemical Company SolidSense FloorCare A (containing 20-50% citric acid). The corrosive liquid at dilution concentration has a pH of 4.5. Employees did not use gloves while filling the mop bucket. This condition exposed the employees to a chemical hazard.-- DELETE (c) McDonald's Restaurants of Colorado, Inc., at 1905 S Federal Boulevard, Denver, CO: On and preceding 3/19/15 McDonald's Restaurants of Colorado, Inc. did not select and require employee(s) to use appropriate hand protection when employees' hands were exposed to hazards such as those from thermal burns. Employees cleaned or scraped two grills which were approximately 300 to 400 degree Fahrenheit. The employer did not ensure that heat resistant gloves were available and worn when employees cleaned or scraped the grills. This condition exposed the employees to a burn hazard.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.132 F03
- Issued
- Jul 16, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $3,400 · Current $3,400
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(f)(3): When the employer had reason to believe that an affected employee who had already been trained did not have the understanding and skill required by paragraph (f)(2) of this section, the employer did not retrain that employee: (a) McDonald's Restaurants of Colorado, Inc., at 1905 S Federal Boulevard, Denver, CO: On 3/19/15 when McDonald's Restaurants of Colorado, Inc. had reason to believe that an affected employee who had already been trained did not have the understanding and skill required by paragraph (f)(2) of this section, the employer did not retrain that employee. One employee filtered approximately 250 degree Fahrenheit oil while cleaning the fryer. The employee was observed by management frequently not using heat resistant gloves, apron, or eye/face protection when performing this task. The employer did not retrain the employee with regards to use of personal protective equipment when cleaning the fryer. This condition exposed the employee to a burn hazard.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $3400
- — C (S) $3400
- — Z (S) $3400
More inspections at Mcdonald'S Restaurants of Colorado, INC.
View Mcdonald'S Restaurants of Colorado, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 722513)
More inspections in CO
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340500255.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.