TIFFIN, OH —
OSHA Inspection: B J PALLET
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of B J PALLET in 525 WALL ST., TIFFIN, OH 44883 (NAICS 321920). OSHA activity number 340500529.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- B J PALLET
- Site address
- 525 WALL ST.
- City
- TIFFIN
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 44883
- Mailing
- 525 WALL ST., TIFFIN, OH 44883
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 321920
- Employees
- 20
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.147 C01
- Issued
- May 11, 2015
- Abate by
- Jun 25, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative: a) On or about March 31, 2015, the employer did not have a lock out program for the control of the hazardous energy, which includes machine specific procedures, training, and periodic inspections, while performing maintenance/servicing and set up on machines such as, but not limited to, the tear down saw. Failure to lock out these components while these tasks are being performed exposes employees to amputation hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1400
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.178 L01 I
- Issued
- May 11, 2015
- Abate by
- Jun 25, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l): a) On or about March 31, 2015, the employer did not assure that employees who operate the Clark and Caterpillar forklifts completed a training program and received a performance evaluation. The employees use the lifts to carry pallets throughout facility.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1000
- — Z (S) $2000
1910.178 P01
- Issued
- May 11, 2015
- Abate by
- Jun 25, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(p)(1): Powered industrial truck(s) found to be in need of repair, defective, or in any way unsafe had not been taken out of service until restored to safe operating condition(s): a) On or about March 31, 2015, the employer did not assure the Clark forklift was removed from service during a time in which it was in need of repair. Employees were exposed to injuries related to unsafe operating conditions in that the horn and back up alarm were not functioning. b) On or about March 31, 2015, the employer did not assure the Caterpillar forklift was removed from service during a time in which it was in need of repair. Employees were exposed to injuries related to unsafe operating conditions in that the propane tank was not secure to the back of the lift.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1000
- — Z (S) $2000
1910.178 Q07
- Issued
- May 11, 2015
- Abate by
- Jun 25, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(7): Industrial trucks were not examined before being placed in service: a) On or about March 31, 2015, the employer did not assure the forklifts were examined for conditions that adversely affect the truck's safety before being placed into service. The Clark lift truck was not in a safe operating condition in that the horn and back up alarm were not operative, preventing the operator from alerting pedestrians. b) On or about March 31, 2015, the employer did not assure the forklifts were examined for conditions that adversely affect the truck's safety before being placed into service. The Caterpillar lift truck was not in a safe operating condition in that the propane tank on the back was not strapped down which could result in a propane leak or fire if it were to fall off of the lift.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.212 A03 II
- Issued
- May 11, 2015
- Abate by
- Jun 11, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s): a) On or about March 31, 2015, the employer did not assure that employees operating the tear down saw were protected from contact with the machines blade. Employees' hands were within several inches of the machine's blade while operating the saw exposing them to amputation hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1000
- — Z (S) $2000
1904.29 A
- Issued
- May 11, 2015
- Abate by
- Jun 25, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.29(a): A log of all Work-Related Injuries and Illnesses (OSHA Form 300), and/or the Summary of Work-Related Injuries and Illnesses, (OSHA Form 300-A) and/or the Injury and Illness Incident Report (OSHA Form 301) or equivalent forms were not kept by the establishment: The employer did not meet the basic requirements for recording injuries and illnesses. OSHA forms 300, and 301 were not maintained for calendar year 2015. On or about March 16, 2015, the company experienced a recordable laceration injury.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at B J Pallet
View B J Pallet's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 321920)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340500529.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.