Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,214Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: MAR-BAR INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MAR-BAR INC. in 101 COMMERCE DRIVE, CUBA, MO 65453 (NAICS 326199). OSHA activity number 340505403.

Watch Mar-Bar INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Mar-Bar INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
MAR-BAR INC.
Site address
101 COMMERCE DRIVE
City
CUBA
State
MO
ZIP
65453
Mailing
101 COMMERCE DRIVE, CUBA, MO 65453
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
326199
Employees
91
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $5000.00 · Current $2500.00 Reduced
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1):     Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employee(s) in that employee(s) were exposed to the hazard of being caught-in:    Inside of the BMC Quality Testing Area, the palm buttons belonging to the following machines were not protected against unintended actuation and arranged by design, construction, or separation so that the concurrent use of both hands was required to initiate the press stroke:    a/  Stokes Spiral Hydraulic Press, m/n 7270, s/n M50954.    b/  DEA Hydraulic Press, unknown m/n or s/n.      One method of abatement to correct this apparent hazard is to arrange each hand control so that protection against unintended actuation and the concurrent use of both hands are afforded as required by ANSI B11.2-1995, paragraph 6.3.9.(2).    DISCLAIMER:    a/  The employer is not limited to the abatement method(s) suggested by OSHA.  b/  The employer is responsible for selecting and implementing an affective abatement method.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2500
  • — Z (S) $5000

1910.23 E01

Other-than-serious 5 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $5000.00 · Current $1000.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.23(e)(1): A standard railing did not have a vertical height of 42 inches nominal from upper surface of top rail to floor, platform, runway, or ramp level:    Inside of the Molding Department, the vertical height of the guardrail system belonging to the following utility platforms was as follows:    a/  The top rail belonging to the utility platform 2005 was approximately 36 inches high.    b/  The top rail belonging to the utility platform 2006 was approximately 35 inches high.    c/  The top rail belonging to the utility platform 2007 was approximately 37 inches high.    d/  The top rail belonging to the utility platform 2008 was approximately 35 inches high.    e/  The top rail belonging to the utility platform 2009 was approximately 35 inches high.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $1000
  • — Z (S) $5000

1910.136 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $5000.00 · Current $3000.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.136(a):  The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used protective footwear when working in areas where there was a danger of foot injuries due to falling or rolling objects, or objects piercing the sole, and where such employee's feet are exposed to electrical hazards:    a/  Inside of the Set-Up Area, the operator of the Kone Crane Underslung 5T Crane, unknown m/n or s/n, was wearing sneakers while lifting steel dies weighing up to 4,500 pounds.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3000
  • — Z (S) $5000

1910.138 A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $7000.00 · Current $3500.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.138(a):  Employers did not select and require employees to use appropriate hand protection when employees' hands were exposed to hazards such as those from skin absorption of harmful substances; severe cuts or lacerations; severe abrasions; punctures; chemical burns; thermal burns; and harmful temperature extremes:    a/  Inside of the BMC Quality Testing Area, operators of the Stokes Spiral Hydraulic Press, m/n 7270, s/n M50954, and the DEA Hydraulic Press, unknown m/n or s/n, were wearing latex gloves while placing the BMC compound into the point-of-operation P.O.O.).  Each P.O.O. remains heated to approximately 340 degrees Fahrenheit.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3500
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.147 C04 II

Serious Gravity 5 21 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $5000.00 · Current $2500.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii):  The energy control procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the scope, purpose, authorization, rules, and techniques to be utilized for the control of hazardous energy, including, but not limited to Items A-D of this section:    The techniques for controlling the 350 degree Fahrenheit thermal energy belonging to the following machines were not identified:    a/  Clifton Compression Press #2028./  Krauss Maffei Injection Press #2013.    b/  Cincinnati Milacron Injection Press #2001.    c/  Cincinnati Milacron Injection Press #2003.    d/  Cincinnati Milacron Injection Press #2004.    e/  Cincinnati Milacron Injection Press #2005.    f/  Cincinnati Milacron Injection Press #2006.    g/  Cincinnati Milacron Injection Press #2007.    h/  Cincinnati Milacron Injection Press #2008.    i/  Cincinnati Milacron Injection Press #2009.    j/  Ferromatic Milacron Injection Press #2010.    k/  Ferromatic Milacron Injection Press #2011.    l/  Compression Press #2034.    m/  Bucher Compression Press #2029.     n/  Bucher Injection Press #2018.    o/  Bucher Injection Press #2019.     p/  Stokes Injection Press #2012.    q/  Stokes Injection Press #2014.     u/  Stokes Injection Press #2015.    r/  Stokes Injection Press #2016.    s/  Stokes Injection Press #2017.    t/  Stokes Injection Press #2029.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2500
  • — Z (S) $5000

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $7000.00 · Current $5000.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1):  Machine guarding was not provided to protect operator(s) and other employees from hazard(s) created by rotating parts:    a/  Inside of the Tool Room, the abrasive surface belonging to the Central Machinery Vertical Sander, unknown m/n, s/n 38123, was unguarded.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5000
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.212 A03 II

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii):  Point(s) of operation (P.O.O.) of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s):  Inside of the BMC Quality Testing Area, the P.O.O. belonging to the following hydraulic presses was not adequately guarded:  a/  Stokes Spiral Hydraulic Press, m/n 7270, s/n M50954.  b/  DEA Hydraulic Press, unknown m/n or s/n.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.212 B

Other-than-serious 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3000.00 · Current $1000.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(b):   Machines designed for a fixed location were not securely anchored to prevent walking or moving:    Inside of the Assembly Process Department, specifically the Re-Work Area, the following machines were not anchored to prevent movement:    a/  Baldor Buffing Machine, m/n 3328, s/n X1208067518.    b/  Baldor Buffing Machine, m/n 3328, s/n X1202037002.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $1000
  • — Z (S) $3000

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340505403.