OSHA Inspection: LAUNCH TRAMPOLINE PARK

Issued

2015-05-20 00:00:00

Abate by

2015-07-08 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $4000.00 · Current $1500.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE):    Facility - On, or about, May April 1, 2015, the employer failed to complete a hazard assessment to determine the proper personal protective equipment  for employee use. Employees worked with chemicals such as, but not limited to Sysco Reliance Bleach, a corrosive cleaner with a pH of 12.6, which contains sodium hypochlorite and requires the use of  personal protective equipment, such as, but not limited, to chemical gloves and chemical goggles.

Issued

2015-05-20 00:00:00

Abate by

2015-07-08 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): Protective eye equipment was not required where there was a reasonable probability of injury that could be prevented by such equipment:    Facility - On, or about, May April 1, 2015, employees were not required to wear protective eye and, or face equipment when required to work with chemicals such as, but not limited to, Sysco Reliance Bleach used to mop the floor and wipe facility bathroom surfaces. Sysco bleach is a corrosive cleaner containing sodium hypochlorite with a pH of 12.6 and requires the use of chemical gloves and chemical goggles.

Issued

2015-05-20 00:00:00

Abate by

2015-07-08 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $5000.00 · Current $2000.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(i): The employer having employee(s) with occupational exposure did not establish a written Exposure Control Plan designed to eliminate or minimize employee exposure:    Facility - On, or about, April 1, 2015, the employer did not establish and implement a written Exposure Control Plan designed to reduce or eliminate employee exposure to bloodborne pathogens when employees were exposed to bodily fluids such as, but not limited to, blood, when required to provide first aid assistance to customers injured at the facility.

Issued

2015-05-20 00:00:00

Abate by

2015-07-08 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1030(g)(2)(i): The employer did not ensure that each employee with occupational exposure participated in a training program:  Facility - On, or about, April 1, 2015, the employer did not train employees on the hazards associated with bloodborne pathogens and the contents of this standard when employees were exposed to bodily fluids such as, but not limited to, blood, when required to provide first aid assistance to customers injured at the facility.

Issued

2015-05-20 00:00:00

Abate by

2015-07-08 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $4000.00 · Current $1500.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1):  The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:    Facility - On, or about, April 1, 2015, the employer failed to develop and implement a written hazard communication program for employees required to worked with chemicals such as, but not limited to, Sysco Reliance Bleach, a corrosive, commercial cleaner containing sodium hypochlorite, with a pH of 12.6.

Issued

2015-05-20 00:00:00

Abate by

2015-07-08 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  Facility - On, or about, April 1, 2015, employees required to work with hazardous chemicals such as, but not limited to, Sysco Reliance Bleach, a corrosive, commercial chemical, containing sodium hypochlorite, with a pH of 12.6, had not received training on the chemical. Employees were not informed of the hazards associated with the chemical, or trained on required personal protective equipment while using the chemical.

Issued

2015-05-20 00:00:00

Abate by

2015-07-08 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $1000.00 · Current $750.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1904.29(a): The employer did not use an OSHA 300, 301 and 300A Form or equivalent.    Facility - On, or about, April 1, 2015, the employer failed to record the required data as found on the OSHA 300 logs, such as days away from work, job transfers or restrictions, for an employee injury sustained on February 17, 2015.