CONROE, TX —
OSHA Inspection: RICARDO RANGEL
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of RICARDO RANGEL in 2627 ROYAL FIELD LN., CONROE, TX 77385 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 340510932.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- RICARDO RANGEL
- Site address
- 2627 ROYAL FIELD LN.
- City
- CONROE
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 77385
- Mailing
- 7806 DEWVILLE LN., HOUSTON, TX 77037
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238140
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Jun 1, 2015
- Abate by
- Jun 5, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects were not protected by protective helmets: The employer does not ensure that employees working in the area where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects were protected by protective helmets. This violation occurred on or about April 1, 2015 on the East side of the job site area where an employee was exposed to a struck-by hazard when working underneath a load of bricks that were on a second level of a scaffold. Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that employees that were working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects are protected by protective helmets.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $1600
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Jun 1, 2015
- Abate by
- Jun 5, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents. The employer does not provide eye and face protective equipment when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury. This violation occurred on or about April 1, 2015, when an employee was exposed to a struck-by hazard operating a Dewalt cut-off saw to cut brick without wearing eye and face protective equipment. Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that employees use eye and face protective equipment when operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.451 B01
- Issued
- Jun 1, 2015
- Abate by
- Jun 5, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports. The employer does not ensure that each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports. This violation occurred on or about April 1, 2015 when employees were exposed to a fall hazard while doing masonry work from the outrigger of a scaffold and first section without it being fully planked. Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that working levels of scaffolds are fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $1600
1926.451 C02
- Issued
- Jun 1, 2015
- Abate by
- Jun 5, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2): Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames, or uprights did not bear on base plates, mud sills or other adequate firm foundation: The employer does not ensure that scaffold legs bear on base plates and other adequate firm foundation. This violation occurred on or about April 1, 2015 at the job site where employees were exposed to fall hazards when working on a scaffold without base plates. Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that scaffold legs bear on base plates.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $1600
1926.451 E01
- Issued
- Jun 1, 2015
- Abate by
- Jun 5, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used. Cross braces were used as a means of access. The employer does not ensure that employees have a ladder, stairway, or ramp to access a scaffold. This violation occurred on or about April 1, 2015 when an employee was exposed to a fall hazard when climbing the cross braces more than 2 feet above the ground. Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that employees have safe access to the scaffold platform.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $1600
1926.452 C02
- Issued
- Jun 1, 2015
- Abate by
- Jun 5, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.452(c)(2): Tubular welded frames and panels were not braced by cross, horizontal, or diagonal braces, or combination thereof, which would have secured vertical members together laterally: The employer does not ensure tubular welded frames and panels were braced by cross, horizontal, or diagonal braces, or combination thereof. This violation occurred on or about April 1, 2015, at the job site where employees were exposed to a struck-by hazard when they were permitted to work on a tubular welded scaffold that did not have cross braces on the second level next to the house. Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that tubular welded frames and panels were braced by cross, horizontal, or diagonal braces, or combination thereof.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $1600
More inspections at Ricardo Rangel
View Ricardo Rangel's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238140)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340510932.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.