Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: INDUSTRIAL PROCESS AND SENSOR, INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of INDUSTRIAL PROCESS AND SENSOR, INC. in 2109 HOLLAND ROAD, ALTON, IL 62002 (NAICS 332812). OSHA activity number 340513712.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Industrial Process and Sensor, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Industrial Process and Sensor, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2109 HOLLAND ROAD
City
ALTON
State
IL
ZIP
62002
Mailing
2109 HOLLAND ROAD, ALTON, IL 62002
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332812
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.133 A01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2015
Abate by
Oct 13, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,360 · Current $952 Reduced

Hazardous substances 07301860

29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation:    The employer did not provide chemical splash goggles or a face shield at all times for employee eye protection when working with nitric acid solution and copper solution in tanks.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $952
  • — Z (S) $1360

1910.138 B

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2015
Abate by
Oct 20, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,360 · Current $952 Reduced

Hazardous substances 07301860

29 CFR 1910.138(b): The employer did not base selection of appropriate hand protection on an evaluation of the performance characteristics of the hand protection relative to the tasks to be performed, conditions present, duration of use, and the hazards and potential hazards identified:    The employer did not select appropriate hand protection:    a) Exposure to nitric acid hazards were addressed with latex gloves instead of butyl or PVC, and     b) Exposure to copper solution hazards were addressed with gloves that did not protect the forearm.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $952
  • — Z (S) $1360

1910.151 C

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2015
Abate by
Nov 18, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,360 · Current $952 Reduced

Hazardous substances 07301860

29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use:    In the engraving room, where nitric acid dip etching and copper dip etching are performed, employees were not provided with a means to flush the skin or eyes from acid and corrosive splashes.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $952
  • — Z (S) $1360

1910.132 D01 I

Other-than-serious 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2015
Abate by
Oct 20, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 07301860

29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1)(i): When the employer had assessed the workplace hazard(s) and determined that hazard(s) were present, the employer did not select and/or use the types of personal protective equipment that would protect the affected employee from the hazards identified:  The employer assessed workplace hazards for employees working with the nitric and copper etching operations and determined that hazards were present, however the employer did not select or require the use of suitable types of personal protective equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Industrial Process and Sensor, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340513712.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.