Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MAGIC ROOFING AND SIDING INC.

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of MAGIC ROOFING AND SIDING INC. in 320 NORTH DUPONT HWY, NEW CASTLE, DE 19720 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 340522663.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Magic Roofing and Siding INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Magic Roofing and Siding INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
320 NORTH DUPONT HWY
City
NEW CASTLE
State
DE
ZIP
19720
Mailing
13 HICKORY HILL DRIVE, EWING, NJ 08618
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B10

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
May 6, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,820 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10): Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs, with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems.    a) 320 N. Dupont Highway, New Castle, DE- Employees were preparing to install a new roof approximately 20' above grade.  Employees had lanyards and harnesses available on the roof, but the employees were not tied off.  Observed on 4/6/15.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1820
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.501 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 6, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems.  a) 320 N. Dupont Highway, New Castle, DE- An employee was cleaning the roof above a window approximately 8' above grade.  The employee did not have any means of fall protection available.  Observed on 4/6/15.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
May 6, 2015
Abate by
Jun 2, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  a) 320 N. Dupont Highway, New Castle, DE- Employees were working approximately 8 feet and 20 feet above grade, without fall protection training.  Observed on 4/6/15.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.502 D21

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 5 exposed
Issued
May 6, 2015
Abate by
May 12, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,820 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(21): Personal fall arrest systems were not inspected prior to each use for wear, damage, and other deterioration, and/or defective components were not removed from service:    a) 320 N. Dupont Highway, New Castle, DE- Employees were wearing a harness with a "D" ring which appeared to be corroded, the belt was worn out, labels were not intact, chemical discoloration was observed, and the harness was too big for the user.  Observed on 4/6/15.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1820
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 5 exposed
Issued
May 6, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,300 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:    a) 320 N. Dupont Highway, New Castle, DE- Employees were using a ladder to reach the roof approximately 20 feet above grade.  The ladder was not extended 3 feet above the upper landing. Observed on 4/6/15.    b) 320 N. Dupont Highway, New Castle, DE- An employee was using a ladder to reach a roof approximately 8 feet above lower level, with a ladder which was not extended 3 feet above the upper landing. Observed on 4/6/15.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1300
  • — Z (S) $2000

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340522663.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.