PAGO PAGO, AS —
OSHA Inspection: MULISELU & FANOLOLE GROUP
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MULISELU & FANOLOLE GROUP in OTTOVILLE MORMON HOUSING, PAGO PAGO, AS 96799 (NAICS 236116). OSHA activity number 340529155.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MULISELU & FANOLOLE GROUP
- Site address
- OTTOVILLE MORMON HOUSING
- City
- PAGO PAGO
- State
- AS
- ZIP
- 96799
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 2295, PAGO PAGO, AS 96799
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 236116
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- May 1, 2015
- Abate by
- May 7, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,224 · Current $857 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: a. On April 1, 2015, on the ground, employees were not wearing hard hats below those employees on the roof, exposing themselves to an overhead hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $856.8
- — Z (S) $1224
1926.501 B01
- Issued
- May 1, 2015
- Abate by
- May 7, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,224 · Current $857 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems. a. On April 1, 2015, on the 10 foot pitch roof, employees installing corrugated roof materials were not protected from a 12 feet fall hazard by the use of a fall protection system.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $856.8
- — Z (S) $1224
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- May 1, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,040 · Current $728 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access: a. On April 1, 2015, the step ladder used to gain access and egress from the roof did not extend three feet above the landing, exposing employees to a 12 feet fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $728
- — Z (S) $1040
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 236116)
More inspections in AS
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340529155.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.